Title

Return to an address

Identifier

http://www.nflibrary.ca/nfplindex/show.asp?b=1&ref=oo&id=298028

page

c

Bibliographic Citation

Return to an address-- the amount of war losses awarded to individuals or persons in Upper Canada, and remaining unpaid.

10167812

Return to an address-- the amount of war losses awarded to individuals or persons in Upper Canada, and remaining unpaid.

Type

Text

extracted text

8 Vieto•iw.

Appendix (J. J, J.)

A. 1844-5.

Appendix

Appendix
(J. J. J.)

(J. J. J.)

RETUR N

24th March.

24th March.

To an ADDRESS from the Legislative Assembly to His Excellency the Governor General,
bearing date the 18th ultimo, praying for a Return of the amounts which have already
been expended for completing the Welland Canal from Thorold and Lock No. 18, respectively, to Port Dalhousie; the amount to be expended at Port Dalhousie for deepening
the entrance, constructing Piers, protecting Works, the annual cost of keeping the entrance
clear of sand, the depth of water there will be on the Bar when the contemplated Works
are completed, and a Statement of all necessary expenditures connected with the said
Harbour at Port Dalhousie ; with such Observations on the shallowing of the water on the
Lake, as may have been made by the Officers of the Board ; and also whether a certain
Survey, or pretended Survey, made by the subordinate Officers of the Board, during the
Polling days of the late Election for the Town of Niagara, from Thorold to the said Town,
was made under the authority of the Board of Works,—if so, the information derived by
such Survey, and the intention of the Board in making the same.
By Command,

SECRETARY'S OFFICE,
Montreal, 24th March, 1845.

D. DALY, Secy.

Letter from the Secretary of the Board of Works
to the Provincial Secretary, with three Enclosures.
BOARD OF WORKS,

Montreal, 24th March, 1845.
SIR,—Upon receipt of the Resolution of the House
of Assembly, calling for certain information as to the
cost of completing the Welland Canal from Thorold
and from the head of Lock No 18, respectively, to
Port Dalhousie, and other particulars connected therewith, the Chief Engineer in charge of the work was
immediately written to, and instructed to furnish the
details called for. These have been furnished, and I
have now the honor of enclosing them to you, in order•
that they may be presented to the House by the proper
officer.
I have the honor to be, Sir,

Your very obedient servant,
THOMAS A. BEGLY,

Secretary",
Hon D. DALY,
Provincial Secretary.

Q. The annual cost of keeping the present enA. £150. It is not probable
that this expenditure will hereafter be necessary, as all
the silt can be removed in the spring by the water discharged from the immense reservoir situated above the
first Lock.

trance clear of sand ?

—

Q. The depth of water there will be over the Bar
when the contemplated works are completed ?—A. 12
feet at low water mark.
Q. A statement of all the necessary expenditures
connected with said Harbour at Port Dalhousie ? A.
Salary of Harbour Master and Light House Keeper,
cost of maintaining Light, and other similar expenses
requisite in all harbours.
—

Q. Such observations as may have been made by the
officers of the Board relative to the shallowing of the water of the Lake.—A. A daily record of the levels kept by
the Lock Tender during the last two years, and the observations of the same person during 15 years, corroborated by those made at Fort Niagara, tend to shew that
the water is higher now than it was many years ago.
Q. Whether the recent Survey was made under the
authority of the Board of Works ? A. The Survey was
made by order of the Chairman of the Board (October
25th.)
—

(First Enclosure.)
Q. The information derived by such Survey ? A. See
Plan and Report, which shew that although the ground
between No 12 and Niagara is extremely favorable for
the location of a Canal, the_disadvantages of the
Niagara Harbours, and the greater length and cost of
this route, would, under any circumstances, have rendered its selection inexpedient.
—

proposed in a Resolution of the House of
Assembly, dated 18th February 1845.

QUESTIONS

Q. The amount already expended in reconstructing
the Welland Canal from the head of the 12th (weir)
Lock to Port Dalhousie ?—A. £119,200.
Q. FronaThorold to the same place, i. e. Port Dalhousie ? A. £211,361.
—

Q. Amount to be expended for deepening and constructing Piers at Port Dalhousie ?—A. £17,541.

Q. The intention of such survey ? A. To comply
with the request made by Mr. Cayley and other gentlemen resident in Niagara.
—

S. _POWER.

A. 1844-5.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

8 Victoria.

Appendix

Appendix

( G. G. G.)

(First Enclosure.)

G.G.G.)

No. 1.

22d March,

22d March.

LIST of War Loss Claims remaining unpaid of the 3rd or 333 per cent. Third Instalment on
the original award under Provincial Statute 4 Geo. IV, cap. 4, and 3 Will. IV, cap. 26 and
27, to be paid by monies raised on Debentures bearing interest at 5 per cent. per annum.

COMMISSIONERS' AWARD.

RESIDENCE.

NAME.

d.

s.

Alyea, John ...
Anderson, Cornelius ...
...
Bellnap, Eleanor
Benedict, Charles
Brown, Cornelius
...
Charron, Antoine
Dale, or Deal, Jacob ...
Derenzy, Elizabeth ...
...
Douglas, Thomas
Filker, John ...
Fulker, Jacob ...
Halket, Jacob ...
Keiter, Benjamin
M‘Kirgan, David
M'Fhee, Hugh
Markle, Jacob
•..
Millar, George
Morison, Charles
Nelson, William
..•
...
O'Keefe, Andrew
Penebeckor, Cornelius
•••
Playter, Eli .,.
Randal, Robert
Roger, William
Smith, Jacob
•••
••,
Sovereign, Robert
Spears, Abigail
•••
Stroud, Christian
Teetzel, John ...
Vankoughnet, John
Warren, John ...
Will, Philip ...
Wilson, John ...

GO •

•••
•••

•••

•••

•••
•••

••.

•.•
•
•••

• ••

•..,
•••
▪
•
•
•••

Ameliasburgh,
York,
Flamboro' East,
Port Talbot, ...
Bertie,
...
Belleville,
Flamboro' West,
..•
York,
York,
•••
Gainsboro',
Ancaster,
Flamboro' West,
Burford,
River Thames,
York,
Toronto,
Thorold,
Baldoon,
.•.
Nelson,
•••
York,
Moravian Town,
York,
...
Stamford,
...
Beverley,
Glanford,
Nelson,
•••
Cornwall,
...
Augusta,
...
Grimsby,
...
Cornwall,
...
D. Bertie,
Beverley,
...
Saltfleet,

•••
• ••

5
12
3
3
3

•••

•••

•••

12
12
23
15
16
20
11
12
20
22
4
3
17
150
5
13
\
4
8
5
5
6
12
3
5
506
5
13

o

311 PER CENT.

-

10
2
0
11
5
3
10
10
0

5
17
9
12
0

10

0

5

7

0
0
0
10

0
12

O
•
6
•
•
•
6
•
•
O
O
6
•
6
O

O
•
•
6
O
O
O
O
O
6

10

0

4
10

6

9
10

6
0

15

0

O

0

5

11
G
•11

10 I

0

1
4
1
1
1
1
4
4
7
5
5
6
3.
4
6

7

1
1
5
50
1
4
1
2
1
1
2
4
1

s.

d.

13

4
4
10
0
8

3
O
O
3
15
1
3
16

0
2

4
8

O

0

8
19
16
4
13
10
6

. 4
2

4
2
4
0

. 8

1

8

15

10
0
4

0

13
6
1Q
13

17

16
1
3
0

8
k3

8
-6
4

0
6
8

1

16

168
1
4

16
13
11

0

12
1
1
9
2

6
6
13
6
15

0

2
8

0
6

0
10
13

'1

10

0

.2 116 I

8

5

0

4
s

FIRST SUPPLEMENTARY RETURN
.4.

Pitts, James ..,

Louth,

•■•

SECOND SUPPLEMENTARY.
B rown,

Henry ...
Kitchen, Henry
Pearson, Andrew
Poole, Catherine
Pannier, Jean Bte.

.••

.••
•••

...

•••

York,
•••
Niagara,
Barton,
Westminster,
Sandwich,

37
4
5
28
8

Stamford,
Mersea,
Pelham,
Cornwall

6
25
5
4

8
8
4
8
0

FOURTH SUPPLEMENTARY.
Bowman, Abner,
Blan, James ...
Moor, Rachel ...
M'Bean, Gillis

•••

•••

•••

• ••

•••

...

,

4
4
6

FIFTH SUPPLEMENTARY.
Meyers, Peter ...

41 i•

.ii

Charlottenburgh,

8

Charlottenburgh,

15

_0

1120

17

SIXTH SUPPLEMENTARY.
M'Dougall, Angus

...

•••

•••

Total,

373 1 12 I

Amount unpaid, Three hundred and seventy-three pounds twelve shillings and sixpence, Currency.
RECEIVER GENERALS OFFICE,

18th February, 1845.

W. MORRIS,

R. G,

6

8 Victoriw.

A. 1844-5.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

Appendix

Appendix

( G.G.G.;

(Second Enclosure.)

(G.G.G.)

No. 2.

22d March.

22d March.

LIST of War Loss Claims remaining unpaid of the Fourth and last Instalment, being 313 per
cent. upon the original award ;—Provincial Statute 4 Geo. IV, and Joint Address of the
Legislature, 24th February, 1837.
CDMMISSIONERS3 AWARD.

RESIDENCE.

NAME.

s.

Alyea, John ...
Anderson, Cornelius ...
Bellnap, Eleanor
Benedict, Charles
Bird, William
Brown, Cornelius
Brunnor, George
Campeau, Louis
Camel, Antoine
Castor, George
...
Charron, Antoine
...
Derenzy, Elizabeth
...
Douglas, Thomas
Dubois, James
Dufour, Charles
Forsyth, Catharine
Fuller, Benjamin
Gortier, Alexis
Hainer, Margaret
o.•
Hall, James ...
Hamden, Luther
Henry, Daniel
Rainer, Frederick
Hubble, Prindle
Hutt, Adam
Inglis, George
Jackson, John
Jones, Peter ...
Kirby, George
•••
Laframboise, Pierre
...
Lagrave, Augustin
...
Livings, Richard
M'Curdy, Richard
M'Kenzie, Alexander
M'Kenzie, Alexander
M'Kenzie, John
M'Kenzie, Kenneth ...
M'Kirgan, David
...
M'Phee, Hugh, estate of
Messimore, John
...
Morden, Capt. James ...
Morrison, Charles
...
Muma, Samuel
O'Keefe, Andrew
Playter, Eli
Randal, Robert
Reneaux, Charles
Scott, Everitt
Searl, William
Smith, Jacob
Smith, John L.
Spears, Abigail
Stroud, Christian
Swayze, Isaac
Teetzel, John
Underwood, William ...
Vannatta, Benjamin ...
...
Vanevery, William
Vankoughnet, John
Walker, Peter
Warren, John
Westover, William
Will, Philip
Wilson, Gilman
•,••
Wright, John ...

•••

Ameliasburgh,
York,
•••
Flamboro' East,
Port Talbot, ...
Woodhouse,
...
Bertie,•
•••
Gosfield,
...
River St. Clair,
Sandwich, ...
Barton,
Belleville,
'..
York,
York,
...
Haldimand, ...
River Canard,
•••
Niagara,
...
•••
Burford,
...
Maidstone, ...
•••
Grantham, ...
Brockville, ...
Haldimand, ...
Ancaster,
...
Moravian Town,
River Thames,
•••
...
Niagara,
Barton,
St. Davids, ..
'Barton,
...
Niagara,
...
Amherstburgh,
•••
Sandwich, ...
Oxford, L. D.
Port Talbot, ...
Malden,
...
Amherstburgh,
River Thames,
Baldoon,
...
River Thames,
York,
...
River Thames,
...
Nelson,
Baldoon,
An caster,
York,
...
•••
York,
•••
•••
Stamford,
River Canard,
St. Davids, ...
Amherstburgh,
...
Glanford,
Saltfleet,
...
Cornwall,
Augusta,
... D. Niagara,
...
Grimsby,
...
Oxford, L. D.
Grantham, ...
Flamboro' West,
...
Cornwall,
...
Woodhouse, ...
...
...
... D. Bertie,
Grantham, ...
...
..•
Beverley,
...
Dunwich,
Oxford, L. D.
•••
.

•••

•••

•••

•••
•.•
•••
•.-4.
••.
••• .., ,
...
,

•• •
_4 , ,
,.,
.. .4
• • •

•• t
.•

•••
•••
••.
.•.

64:

•••

•••

•••

..,

..1 ,
••
.. ., ,
•••
•• •.
••...
•••
... , t.,
•••
...
•••
•..
•••
•
.,••
...

•..
•••
•••
••• •
.....,
•••

0
5
1p ;,
12
2
3
0
3
0
15
11
3
0
18
2
46
12
75
0
9
5
5.
19
12
10
23
0
5
12
10
150
0
18
6
0
10
7
2
0
24
0
4
21
10
0
4
37
18
5
10
1
17
5
17
0
34
0
15
5
20
0
100
10
17
15
4
15
41
6
23
10
2
15
16
12
12
0
20
0
15
0
122
5
3
15
9
0
150
0
13
4
10
,
0
5
12
49
6
128
5
12
0
25
4
6
12
10
,
322
0
3
22
5
.52
Q,
1
'6

Carried over,

632311

tg
40,
10

y

12
506
6
!..3•' '
5
—.',
117 • '
18
.
--.....

d.
0
0

0

0
0
0

4
1
5
14
23
2
1
3
7
1
3
47
2
3

6
0
0

0

0o0

0

0
0

0
6

0
0
0

0

9

0

6
0
0
0
0

0

o
o

0
6
o
o
6
0

0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

6

0
6

0

6
0

6
00

0
0

6
0
0
00

0

2440' 16

.0
o

PER CENT.

d.

.

1
3

6

0

10

0

34

0

8
2
91
0
0
5
1
14 0
12
1/

11
19
19
19
15

17
13
19
8
11
19
10
3
3
15

1 2

gii it

0
'8
2
10
8
2
0

8/

4
0/0
0
P
7
5
4
1
16 2
6
4
1
31
12 , „Q
10
1
11 10/
0
9 3
5
4
15
10
4 15 0
8 3
6
31
13
4
10 10
5
1
10
1
5
4
13
8
7
7
0 -. 45 i 10
1
6
5
19 11i
3
8
6 . 6

4
86'

4 0

8
7
0
1
9
1
3
0
10
47
4
.2
4
6
8
1
8
11
1
3.
14
15
40 12 61 it
7.
15
1
4
7
18
24
5 aqi
19
1
2
3
19
Ai, 8/
102
0 1f
" 11'
7
6
16 12
0
18
1
8 ft
14
1
2
19
3
7 10
160
2
1
2
1 .1-8
1.
1, 10.
37
12
5 ,1 37
•••■••••••

782

8

••

8 V ictorice.

A. 1844--5.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

Appendix

Appendix

LIST of War Loss Claims, &c.—( Continued.)

( G.G.G.)

(G. G. G.)

22d March.

22d March.
" NAME.

PER CENT.
•
••

Brought over, ...

782 1 • 8

2470

16

3

20
30
13
6

10
13
4
Q

0
6
0
0

51

FIRST SUPPLEMENTARY RETURN.
Doan, Israel, estate of ...
Fowler, Nathan
Maisonville, Alexis
Pitts, James ..

Louth,
...
...
Ancaster, now Sandwich,
Amherstburg,
...
Osnabruck, ...
•••
;,,,,a

•• •

SECOND SUPPLEMENTARY RETURN.
Brink, Nicholas
Brown, Henry
Chase, Mark
Edwards, Isaac
Kitchen, Henry
Pearson, Andrew
Pannier, Jean Bte.

•• •

9 10
14 31 12
3 7 -t o
18 0

•
i

Oxford, L. D.
York,
...
Port Talbot, ...
Oxford, L. D.
Niagara,
...
...
Barton,
Sandwich, ...

•• •

6
9
'4
1

15 . 0

W:r
.

37
13
8
4
5

.41
1

I,

:1:7;
.41; :

.0'
... 7
,0
,0
0

4
13 9
11
14 4
4
1,4 81
2
10 8
1
5 4
1 , 11 9
2
12

0
0
6
0
.0
. 0
0

THIRD SUPPLEMENTARY.
Huntly, Enoch

Port Talbot, ...

•• •

5

'19' 4 ft

2
8
100
3
1
1
5
2

7 6
1 9( *S
7 8 i- VS
19 2
11 8
8 Ill a
4 26 so
la
.7

FOURTH SUPPLEMENTARY.
...
Acker, Cornelius
Blane, James,
...
...
Cummings, Thomas, estate of
...
...
Camp, Isaac
Moor, Rachel
M'Bean, Gillis
Suchet, Manuel
...
Slater, Benjamin

Thorold,
:.
Mersea,
...
Chippawa, ...
Nelson,
'. ..
...
Pelham,
..;'I..: —
Cornwall
...
River Thames, W. D. '
Charlotteville,
...e%
.41.1 .
'• i.,
,

FIFTH SUPPLEMENTARY.

7
10
1r
25
317
•0
12•10
,
5
.0
4 .11
16 . 9
/7
.10

0
0
2
0
0
6
0
0

4

;Ilk,

1'
Holmes, William
Meyers, Peter,
M'Cuaig, Eve
Petty, Charles

Niagara,
...
Charlottenburgh,
Ancaster ,
Delaware,
...

...

•••

SIXTH SUPPLEMENTARY.

' 150
••4
•,.... . :. 8
...
15
.;. ,
14
1, I
I 1,
{I, t•

M'Dougall, Angus

...

Sr

Charlottenburgh,
Total,

,;,, r.
.
„o4

0
0
6

15

0

0

3250

2

5

,

Amount unpaid, One thousand and twentylnine pounds four shillings and one penny and

10 0
'. 13 10
15 0
14 2i

47
2
4
4

• 0

10
0
17

,

4

1029'

t .

15. 0
4 1 tik

n of a farthing, Currency.
W. MORRIS,

R. G,
RECEIVER GENERAL'S OFFICE,

18th February, 1845.

Letter from the Civil Secretary to the Provincial
Secretary.
CIVIL SECRETARY'S OFFICE,

•

Indian Department,

"of such payment," I am directed by the Governor
General to inform you that this Department is not in
possession of any information on the subject, but that
an application will be made to the Chief Superintendent
Of Indian Affairs, who, it is possible, may be able to
furnish some.

20th February, 1845.
SIR,.._. With reference to that part of the Address of
the House of Assembly requiring " the names of the
" Indians entitled to such remuneration, whether - it
" has been paid them, and if so, by whom and when ;
"and also a detailed statement of the kind of evidence

have the honor to be, Sir,
Your obedient servant,
J. M. HIGGINSON,

Civil Secretary.
The Honble. D.

DALY,

Provincial Secretary.

•
▪

-

A. 1844-5.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

8 Vietoriw.

Appendix

Appendix

(G. G. G.) Letter from the Chief Superintendent of Indian 1 losses sustained during the late war with the United (G. G. G.)
Affairs to the Civil Secretary, with twelve Enclo- States, viz :
sures.
22d March.
2 2d March.
.
£227 19 6
Moray ians,
78 3 8
Ottawas and Chippawas, .
I
( Copy.)
.
Shawanees,
Hurons, .
Senecas and Cay ugas,

INDIAN OFFICE,

Toronto, 13th March, 1845.

20 7 3
328 12 3 12
9 14 94

•

SIR,—I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt
of your letter of the 21st ultimo, requesting me to I also enclose five Pay Lists which you will be
transtnit to your Department any information in refer- pleased to have acquitted with the least possible delay,
ence to the payment of the Indians for War Losses, and returned to me.
that may be in my possession, and enclos ng a copy of
your letter to the Provincial Secretary, embodying the I have the honor, &c.,
substance of an Address of the I louse of Assembly to
SAML. P. JARVIS,
(Signed,)
His Excellency the Governor General on the subject.
Ch. S. L Affairs.
In reply, I have to observe that shortly after my
appointment to the office of Chief Superintendent, I
was directed by the Lieutenant Governor to remit to
Mr. Superintendent Ironside, the sum of £664 17s. 6d.
and to Major Winniett the sum of £918 9s. 2d., making in all £1583 6s. 8d., being the third, and, I
believe, the last instalment due for War Losses to the
The list of
Indians under their superintendence.
vouchers I placed on the files of this office on that
occasion
herewith transmit. The previous payments of the Indians were made by my predecessor,
and as I do not find any vouchers for them in the
office, I infer that they were at the time transmitted
either to His Excellency the Lieutenant Governor,
the Inspector General, or the Council Office.

Letter from the Chief Superintendent of Indian
.Affairs to .Major Winniett.
(Copy.)

Sin,—I have the honor to enclose herewith, by
this day's mail, Pay Lists numbering from one to nine
inclusive, of the third instalment of War Losses due
to the Six Nations Indians residing on the Grand
River.

In the vouchers for payments of the third instalment
to the Six Nation Indians, the name of each individual who suffered loss is stated, and I presume the previous payments were made to the same individuals.

I also transmit a *draft on the Gore Bank for the
sum of Nine hundred and eighteen pounds nine shillings and two pence, currency, to enable you to pay
the claimants the sums respectively due to them.

I have the honor, &c.

(Signed,)

INDIAN OFFICE,

Toronto, 9th November, 1837.

You will be pleased to have the Pay Lists acquitted
with the least possible delay, and returned to me.

SAML. P. JARVIS,

Ch. S. I. Affairs.

No. 1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,

J. M. HIGGINsoN, Esquire,
&c. &c. &c.

Letter from the Chief Superintendent of Indian
Affairs to Mr. Superintendent Ironside.

St. Regis,
Mohawks, .
Tuscaroras, .
Aughquagas, .
Tutulies,
.
Delawares, .
Onondagas, .
.
Cayugas,
Senecas,

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

£11 13 4
224 1 4
41 2 7+
78 15 8i
12 12 101,
161 8 8+
107 6 81
254 19 3+
26 8 51

I have the honor, &c.,

(Copy.)

(Signed,)

INDIAN OFFICE,

SAML. P. JARVIS,

Ch. S. I. Affairs.

Toronto, 9th November, 1837.

Major WINNIETT,

SIR,-1 have the honor to enclose to you a draft on
the Honble. J. Gordon for the sum of £664 17s. 6d.
enrrency, to enable you to pay the undermentioned
Tribes of Indians the sums respectively due them for

B

*Check drawn by Thos. G. Ridout, Cashier Bank U. C., on A.
Stevens, Esquire, Cashier, Gore Bank, Hamilton, dated 8th Novr.,
1837, No. 5508, for £918 95. 2d. currency.

8 Victoriw.

A. 1844-5.

)

Appendix (G.

Appendix

Appendix

No. 1.—ST. REGIS.

( G. G. G.)

( G. G. G.;

—Th

22cl March.

PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ; 22,1 march.
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum (X5,000) awarded
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of £1,583 6s. £3d. is
now payable.

8
c..,0

Individual
Tribe.

Amount.

Names of Claimants.

Third Payment.

7
8
9
80

St. Regis,

S.

.d.

1 Kaerishon(next of kin of Akal) 3
2 Gonwaheaghtaghneugh, ... 2
3 Big Wood's wife, ...
4 Lookabout,

17
14
12
9

1

£ 11

13

4

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

J. Martin.
0 Gowahentakwen, her + mark.
Lookabout, his + mark.
8 Lookabout, his + mark.

Amounting to Eleven pounds thirteen shillings and fourpence three farthings, Halifax Currency, Dollars at Ss. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
JAS. WINNIETT,

S. I, A.

Witnesses to the above payments :
WILLIAM MUIRHEAD,
JACOB MARTIN.

No. 2.—MOHAWKS.
PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awarded
by the Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the Reign of
His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of X1,583 Gs. 8d. is now
payable.

8

Individual
Tribe.

Names of Claimants.

0

Third Payment.

• Z

80
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
90
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Amount.

Mohawk.
CC
CC
44

ar
CC
CC

'C
CC
44

4C
Cc

CC
CC
CC

X

s.

... 18
1 David Davids,
... 2
...
2 Jacob Brant,
., 0
...
3 Henry Pawlis,
4 Henry Dehowennagrionh, ... 3
.. 17
...
5 Widow Hill, .
.. 3
...
6 Betsy Duncan,
... 3
...
7 Widow Pawlis,
8 Pawlis Onwanegharaugh, ... 6
••• 1
9 Dekanawaghtegueb,
... 1
...
10 Asgwentsigoh,
... 2
...
...
11 Sarvatis,
12 Elizabeth, Joel Smith's sister, 3
13 Warig DeKalarogeugtha, ... 1
... 3
...
14 Henry Liekers,
... i ... 3
15 Deyononnathe,
16 Susannah, Oneida Joseph's
daughter,
...
... 2
17 Margaret Oneida, ...
... 0
2
18 Hester, third daughter,
... 2
19 Widow Warig Carey,

12

£1 68

10

Carried forward,

0

1
6
3
3

0

15
11
2
14
0

6

1

6
14

0

15

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

it'ai-rft) Aka
I Laurence Davis, his + mark.
11 Jacob Brant, his + mark.
2 David Hill, his + mark.
31 Deborah Hill, her + mark.
111 Deborah Hill, her + mark.
3 Jacob Martin.
3 Mary Johnson, her + mark.
10/ Paul Pawlis, his + mark.
41 Catherine Winney, her + mark.
7i Sarah Davids, her --I- mark.
si Lawrence Baptiste, his + mark.
5 J. Martin.
5/ Mary Green, her + mark.
111 Nancy Green, her + mark.
41 Hannah Heron, her + mark.
6 Oneida Joseph, his + mark.
10Q Oneida Joseph, his mark.
11 -1 Lawrence Davis, his X mark.
6 Henry Brant.
.

71

4

8 Vietoriw.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

A. 1844-5.
Appendix

Appendix

PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants, &c.—( Continued.)

(G. G. G.)
•

22d March.

ea
C.)

A,

22d March.

Individual
Tribe.

;''' Names of Claimants.

Amount.

I

Third Payment.

Z1

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the'Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

S.

Brought forward,
Mohawk.
200
2
3
6
6
7
8
9
210
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
220
1

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
230
2
3
4
6

cc

cc
cc
cc
''
C'
''
'C
'C

''
CC
'C

'C

'C
C'

'C
4C
''

CC
CG
cc
CC
CC
''
CC
CC
44

7
8
9
40

CC
CC
iC
''

2
3
4
5
6

7
8
9
50
1

2
3
4
5
6

7

8

‘C
'C

CC

CC

C:
CC
'C
''
''
''

I.

10

71

6
61 Christian Lewis, her + mark.
•-•-:, 2
6
2
6/J. Martin.
'..:. 8 15
9 Catharine Hill, her -I-- mark.
0 14 102 Oneida Joseph, his + mark.
0
... 1
5/J. Martin.
••• 1 17
22 Hannah Claus, her + mark.
1
4/Magdalen Carpenter, her + mark.
•••• 3
8
.... 2
mark.
42 George Martin, his
7
••• 0
5/J. Martin.
2 Jacob Johnson, his -I- mark.
••. 8 11
3
•„,.. - 3
3 J. Martin.
21 Hester Hill, his + mark.
..i 1 '43 10
3 Sarah Hill, her -I- mark.
... '- 2 10
-:
33 Margaret Hurst,
...
... 0 14. 10/ Oneida Joseph, his + mark.
34 English Joe's wife, Hester
0
English,
mark.
11 Lawrence Davis, his
...
... 2
35 Tekarihoga,
...
... 213 49 ..11111annah Newhouse, her + mark.
4/John Hill, his + mark.
- l3
36 John Hill, senior, ...
37 Widow Elizabeth, ...
9/J. Martin.
••. , 1
9
... - 0 - 14 10g. Samuel Coffee, his -I- mark.
38 Widow Hannah Coffee,
39 Nikawegneuta,
... '0 '13
..
0- Lawrence Thomas, his + mark.
... , 2
6 6 Henry Brant.
40Catharine Nasey Brant,
32 Esther Froman, her -I- mark.
41 Young Troublesome Jacob, 0
-9
...
... '3
1
4/J. Martin.
42 Widow Filler,
O 1 1 1 Margaret Hess, her -I- mark.
2
43 Widow Kanaroghkta,
ii•
..'. 3
1
11J. Martin.
...
44 Little Peter,
...
1 3 J Martin.
3 18
45 John Green,
mark.
5
32 Elizabeth Lottridge, her
2
4e Samuel Lottridge, ...
5
52 Esther Martin, her -I- mark.
47 Widow Deyoreayon,
O
6 John Froman, his -I- mark.
...
48 John Vrooman,
"t4t 2 15
...
49 John Davids,
14,
42 Lawrence Davis, his + mark.
At
50 Daniel, (a war chief,
6-1, Daniel Spinger, his + mark.
4 Lawrence Davids, his -I- mark,
51 Lawrence Davids, ...
'2
•.• 1
...
7
9 Isaac Lewis, his + mark.
52 Eve Lewis,
mark.
4/Aaron Fraser, his
53 Widow Hester Hill,
1
3
2
...
.•• 1
4 . J. Martin.
54 Peter Major,
.. 1 17
2/Isaac Locke, his + mark.
55 Jaoah sareth a,
•.•
0 18
7 Elizabeth Ball, her + mark.
56 Jammima,
... 2 12
1 Catharine Hill, her --I- mark.
...
57 Isaac Hill,
58 Widow Hester Troublesome t Q. 14 102 Esther Martin, her -I- mark.
:: ' 0' 14 102 Mary Maracle, her + mark.
59 Lawrence Green, ... '
..
'...i. Y:1!
9 9/John George, his + mark.
60 Dewasengh tha,
... ', 1.
4 Isaac Lewis, his -I- mark.
61 Jacob Lewis, ` ...
2
62 Mrs. Brant, (Bay of Quinte,) 6'
8
4/J. Martin.
••• 2 12
•••
1 Esther Hill, her --I- mark.
63 Jacob Hill,
mark.
...
.17
22 Joseph Martin, his
64 Joseph Martin,
„-•-••
•••
6/ Mary Johnson, her -I- mark.
...
65 Otariohogh,
6
66 Dione Prince's daughter, .... 0
7/J. Martin.
5
mark,
67 Jacob Deharonawaryks, ... 0 14 10// .Jacob Johnson, junior, his
... 5 15
4/ J. Martin.
68 Peggy Symington,
... 1
9 J. Martin.
69 Mary Symington,
7
•,.... 2
70 William Johnson,
7-1 William Johnson, his X mark.
••• 0 14 102 Susannah Davids, her ± mark.
...
71 Richard Davids,
9/ Deborah Hill, her + mark.
2
72 Henry Tewhannas,
2
- „ 10
...
O 11 J. Martin.
73 Peter Pawlis,
mark.
3 John Green, his
••• 3
74 Jemima, Brant,
3
20 Guistin Joanghuance,
21 DeKaneatarighgwar,
...
22 George Hill,
23 Keheroriorketreen, ...
..
24 Isaac Bamberry,
25 Thomas Sulkey,
26 Henry Hill,
...
27 George Martin,
...
28 John Deyoneghguen,
29Jacob Johnson,
...
,..
30 Joel Smith,
...
31John Hill,
32 Seth Hill,

,

iC
AC
t4

75 Prince Van Vater, ...
...
76 Seth Hills,
•,•
77 ppisla Joseph,

41 "

I

•••
•••
224

111

G. G. G.)

Van Patter, his + mark.
J. Martin.
10:/ Oneida Joseph, his + mark,
7 22

1I4

•

Amounting to the sum of Two hundred and twenty-four pounds one shilling and fourpence, Halifax Currency,/
Dollars at 5s. each,
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
JAS. WINNJETT,
Witnesses to the foregoing payments :—WILLIAM MuntHEAn,
S. I. A.
JACOB MARTIN.

A ppendix (G. G. G.)
Appendix

22d March.

Appendix

No. 3.—TUSCARORAS.

:G. G. G.)
—A—,

A. 1844-5.
( G. G. G.)

PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian
Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
•
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awarded
by the Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the Reign
of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of £1,583 6s. 8d. is now
payable.
Individual

*;1
C.)

Names of Claimants.

Tribe.
Alp

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
Third Payment. having signed duplicate receipts.
Amount.

,;4 C,V.•Gt
,

.-.S!

d.

8.

y 1

9
60

Tuscaroras.
44

1

CC

2
3
4
5
266

GC

7

lC

8
9
70

1

2
3
4
5
6
7

CC
4C
44
GC

CC
CC

cc
CG

C'
CC
CC
CC

'C

CC

... 0 17
...
1 Powder Face,
2 Susannah Bill, Jack's sister, 0 19
9
... 3
3 Widow Catharine,
6
2
4 Aaron Tuscarora,
4
. ••,. .- 1
5 William Tuscarora,
.. • .; 0 19
...
6 Kawenneyesha,
2
'. 2
7 Thomas Tuscarora,
... 0 15
8 Paulus Tuscarora,
P.-.. t3 19
Waharanghyakelsgo,
10 Black Chief,
...
•!; 5 11
;..., , 1 18
...
11 Awaneyeseugh,
1..., D' 11
12 Warigh Tuscarora,
. ••„ i' 3 17
...
13 White Coat,
! ..+ t.' 0 15
14 Bublick,
...
8
Fl.. : .7
15 Bill Jack's family, ...
18
••G ': 11
16 Kayeughneghson, ...
...
, .., . 0 15
17 Kawaynageare,
••, . ,..0 15
...
18. Oja,
o 17
19 Kaneughriahawi,
£ 41

41 Elizabeth Johnson. her -I- mark.
3i George Mountpleasant, his mark.
41John Whitecoat, his
mark.
31 Aaron Nash.
11- Elizabeth Cusack, her + mark.
31 John Thomas, his + mark.
5i John Thomas, his
mark.
5/Elizabeth Cusack, her ± mark.
1
1 /Elizabeth
Cusack, her ± mark.
10 Sally Grote, her -I-- mark.
6/ Sage Harris, his + mark.
6( Elizabeth Jack, her + mark.
2 1 Jahn Whitecoat, his + mark.
5/ Sage Harris, his + mark.
61Sage Harris, his + mark.
st Sarah Longfish, her mark.
5/ Susannah Jack, her + mark.
5/Jacob Oja, his + mark.
4/ Mary Anderson, her -I- mark,

2

Amounting to Forty-one pounds two shillings and seven pence half-penny, Halifax Currency, Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
Witnesses to the foregoing payments,—WILLIAM MIIIRHEAD,

JAS. WINNIETT,

S. I. A.

JACOB MARTIN.

No. 4.—AUGHQUAGAS.
PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awarded
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of X 1,583 6s. 8d.
is now payable.
8
C.)

0

Individual
Tribe.

Names of Claimants.

Amount.
Third PayMent.

X

8.

8 Aughquagas.
CG
9
CC
80
9

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

1 Sarragonah,
2 Widow Doratin,
3 Widow Cobus,
4 Jacob Scharmhorn,
5 Peter Green,
6 Kakshagh,
7 Delaware Aaron, ...
8 Peter Smith,
9 Peter the Runner, ...
10 Lawrence, Aaron's son,
11 Dehaweyagea,
12 Wareyabgonagh,
Carried forward,

5
1
8
3

0

2

0

3
3
3
2
£ 32

2
18
,3
17
13
15
0

13
3
15
9
0

13

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

d.
J. Martin.
7 Isaac Bucasing, his
mark.
8 J. Martin.
J. Martin.
21 Peter Green, his + mark.
5/ J. Martin.
Peter Green, his + mark.
6 Eve Hill, her + mark.
Susannah Green, her + mark.
3 Susannah Green, her + mark.
5 Peter Green, his + mark.
61 Catherine Dickson, her + mark.
10

22d March.

▪ G. G.)
Appendix (G.

8 Victorioe.

Appendix

ppendix

PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants, &c.—( Continued.)

G. G.)
!4:1 March.

A. 1844-5.

g
0

22d March.

Individual
Tribe.

Amount.

Names of Claimants.

Third Payment.

z

s.

Brought forward,
90 Aughquagas.
91
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
300
1
2
-3
4
5
44
CC

4C

4i

''
CC

CC

it

13 Aughquaga Joseph,
14 Joseph Frin,
15 Thenegtha,
16 Kaneyengotaugh,
17 Wari Schoharie,
18 Elizabeth Schoharie,
19 Gitiyea,
•••
••.
20 Nicholas,
•••
21 Water Snake,
22 Widow Kaynayegh,
23 Nicholas Gideon, ...
24 Kaneghsonnengtha,
25 Widow Steynnoon,
26 Hananayentou,
27 Shaghsennatigh,
28 Tagwaraghseutha,

6

0
0
•• •

2

•• •

0
0

8
6
2
0
•• •

•••
•• •

•• •

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

d.

13 10

32

8
1
3

0
0

3

31 Isaac Aughquaga, his + mark.
9
si Adam Frin, his + mark.
19
31 J. Martin.
10
1+ Jacob Isaac, hig -± mark.
5 9+ Lewis Snow, his + mark.
11
7 Lewis Snow, his ± mark.
11 71Mary Nicholas, her + mark.
9
2 1 Moses Walker, his + mark.
O
6 Elizabeth Johnson, her ± mark.
15
51 Joseph Otter, his + mark.
Oi Mary Nicholas, her ± mark.
O
3
2 Elizabeth Johnson, her + mark.
13 31 Magdalen Mary, her + mark.
11
7 Jacob Isaac, his + mark.
11 7 Mary Crawford, her + mark.
1
8 Catherine Dickson, her + mark.

-7

8
78 15
Amounting to the sum of Seventy-eight pounds fifteen shillings and eight pence half-penny, Halifax Currency,
Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
JAS. WINNIETT,
S. I. A.

Witnesses to the foregoing payments :WILLIAM MUIRHEAD,
JACOB MARTIN.

No. 5.—UPPER AND LOWER TUTULIES.
PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awar'ded
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of .E1,583 Gs. 8d.
is now payable.
Individual
Tribe.

Names of Claimants.

Amount.
Third Payment.

Iv

6 Upper Tutulies.
7
8
9
10
CC

1 Lower Tutulies.
2
3
'C
4
5

i+i44

1 Charles Tutulie,
2 Nicrouhagh,
3 Yoehahowan e ugh, ...
4 Yeneughwaghtowaneugh,
5 John Tutulie,
•••
•,•

...
1 Molly,
2 Sleepy Davy,
3 Black Face,
4 Molly's Grandson, ...
5 Curley headed George's sonin-law, ...

s.

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

d.

+ i., fat
'

1
3
0 17
3
3 9
0 8

1 3 Nigouhah, his -I- mark.
4+ Nigouhah, his + mark.
11 J. Martin.
51 Christy Ann, her + mark.
8 John Tutulie, his + mark.

7

1

9 14

0

16
17
3
7

2
1
0

6
5 11

2+ Molly, her + mark.
10/ Sleepy Davy, his + mark.
11 Black Face, her + mark.
81 J. Martin.
2 J. Martin.
1

Total,
12 12 101,
Amounting to Twelve pounds twelve shillings and ten pence half-penny, Halifax Currency, Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

_ Witnesses to the above payments :—
WILLIAM MUIRHEAD,
JACOB MARTIN.

(G.G.G.)

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
JAS. WINNIETT,
S. I. A.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

8 Victoria.
p
d
Apenix

9

w

Appendix

No. 6.—DELAWARE.

( G. G. G.)

PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of X5000 awarded
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of £1,583 6s. 8d.
is now payable.

22dMarch.

( G. G. G. )
2 d March

A. 1844-5.

Individual
Tribe.

0

Amount.

Names of Claimants.

zci

Third Payment.
8.

d.

1
1 Petop, (Village Chief,)
2 Kill Snake,
...
.
7
3 Abraham Young,
1
.•
4 Adam
2
10
5' Cornelius, (one fish,)
...
6John Montour,
.
6
2
7IJoseph Chew,
1
8 Poney,
•••
•••
•••
9 Thorn Snake,
... 5
•••
...
... 5
10 John Wampum,
11 Shoemaker Snake, ...
4
...
...
... 8
12 Dick,
13 Widow of Captain Simmey, 1
14 Delaware Jim's Aunt,
6
...
2
15 Delaware Jim,
...
4
16 John Hottenbar,
17 John Delaware,
...
2
18 Left hand Isaac,
0
2
19 Joe Jackson,
••• 9
20 Abraham Huff,
1
21 Delaware Peggy,
22 Moses Wife,
.,.., 8
••• 3
23 Old Moses,
24 Joseph Montour,
14
...
25 Delaware Toad,
6
26 John Trinis ,
9
•
...
0
27 Capt. Soap,
...
2
28 Joe Dick,
29 Capt. Thom, (War Chief,) ... 12
...
0
30 Hank Young,
... 4
...
31 Jabob Vandal,
32 Jacob, son to the Commissary, 6
... 4
33 John Curley,
...
...
2
34 Thomas,

8
6
14
14
4
16
6
18
15
15
16
0
4
9
6
6
17
4
17
12
10

111 Catharine Moses, her + mark.

£ 161

8

£
6
7
8
9
20

1

2
3
4
5
6
7

Delawares.

Lf
44
''
Li
CC
44
4C

.

8

9
30

CC
44
CL

1

IL

3
4

LL

6
7

LL

LL

44
LL

if
CC

9
90

CC

GC

1

iC

3
4
5
6

C:

7

''

8
9

CC

LL

CC
CC
CC

CC

Received of 3 amuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

7

9
8
19
12
2
6
10
4
6
5
6
17

7/ John Wampum, his mark.
9 Samuel Chew, his + mark.
2/J. Martin.
6 Mrs. Moses, her + mark.
111 Mrs. Moses, her + mark.
3i John Moses, his 4. mark.
7/ Mrs. Moses, her + mark.
9 Joseph Snake, his
mark.
9 John Wampum, his + mark.
5/J. Martin.
0 Hannah Dockstetter, her + mark.
I/ J. Martin.
3 J. Martin.
3%J. Martin.
9/ Jim Hottenbar, his mark.
10Q John Huff, his
mark.
9/ Kenteahoh, her + mark.
9% J. Martin.
11/John Huff; his —I-- mark.
101 Catherine Moses her
mark.
61 Catherine Moses, her + mark.
4/ John Moses, his + mark.
10 Betsey Huff, her + mark.
1/J. Martin.
10$ John Moses, his
mark.
11/Patrick Lathom, his —I-- mark.
4 Hannah Dockstetter, her + mark.
fq William Thom, his + mark.
9(John Hank, his
mark.
KJ. Martin.
5 W. Jacob, his + mark.
9/ P. Lathom, his + mark.
9(Joe Snake, his ± mark.
,

8%

Amounting to the sum of One hundred and sixty-one pounds eight shillings and eight pence three farthings,
Halifax Currency, Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
JAS. WINNIETT,

S. I. A.
Witnesses to the foregoing payments :WILLIAM MUIRHEAD,

J ACOB MARTIN.

etioktial
oat.■14.-.V4'

8 Victorioe.

A. 1844-5.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

Appendix

Appendix

( G. G. G.)
22d March.

No. 7.—ONONDAGAS.
PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awarded
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, the sum of £1,583 6s. 8d., part
thereof being now payable.
Individual
0

Tribe.

Amount.

Names of Claimants.

ThirdPayment
X
50
1
2
3
4
5
356
8
9
60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
70

1

2
3
4
5
7
6

Onondagas.
44
CC

CC
CC
CC

44
C4
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC

CC,
CC
CC

CC
CC

CC
CC
CC
CC

CC

... 3
...
1 Seed Corn,
••,
••• 6
2 Echo,
...
••• 10
3 Sir John's Chief,
4 Shaoghurrajowance,
... 6
5 John Bearfoot or family, and
his relations,
...
.. 18
6 Kanahactahesa,
...
... 3
7 Kanowrarou,
...
...
8 Withalotorho (2d Clear Sky,)
... 5
9 Widow Clear Sky's,
1
...
10 Wahotsighgnahon, ...
11 Athaghserarea,
...
••. 6
12 Osahetagearat,
.•. ).
13 Katsitaks,
,,4 0
14 Kayentagonagh,
.., 4
...
4,
15 Sera woagh,
...
...
16 Shagoghseawgeghte, ...
••.
4
17 Onakarontough,
... 3
18 Kanatagheiron,
19 Otisnoughyata,
2
20 Karaghguagh,
1
21 Soghueakuese,
•••
•.. 4
1
22 Rayatawentogogoh, ...
•••
23 Dehowenagriough, ...
... 3
24 Peggy Crawford,
..
... 1
25 William Crawford, ...
26 Kanouraron,
...
•••
27 Shadekarias,
.., 7

..•

0

1
1

s.

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

d.

41 Catherine, her ± mark.
9
3 ' 6 John Echo, his + mark.
16 ' 1 Thomas Hill, his 1-- mark.
3 6 Kaneayowiseh, his ± mark.
•7

3/Joseph Bearfoot, his + mark.
7/ Kanaserone, her + mark.
3 Baptiste, his + mark.
0 J. Martin.
2Q Mary Bearfoot, her -I- mark.
6/ Catherine, her + mark.
1 William, Ins + mark.
0/Tanehtoah, her + mark.
8 Sarah Thomas, her + mark.
10/Peter, his 4- mark.
6 Kahonyoutye, her + mark.
91J. Martin.
4/John Buck, his + mark.
Kanatarirhon, her + mark.
3/John, his + mark.
1 Aswahtha, his ± mark.
7tTehonenaes, his + mark.
0+Jacob, his ± mark.
9 John Buck, his + mark.
6+ Mary Sky, her + mark.
5/ Mary Sky, her + mark.
5/Thomas Hill, his + mark.
10/ Mary, her ± mark.

14
3
4
14
4
18
11
5
7
4
13
5
18
7
6
3
10
5

1

16
18
18
0

£ 107
6
8i
Amounting to One hundred and seven pounds six shillings and eight pence half-penny, Halifax Currency, Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
Witnesses to the foregoing payments,—WILLIAM MUIRHEAD,
JACOB MARTIN.

JAS. WINNIETT,

S. I. A.

No. 8.—UPPER AND LOWER CAYUGAS.
PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awarded
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of £1,583 6s. 8d.
is now payable.
ce
E3
c-

Individual
Tribe. Names of Claimants. Amount.
Third Payment.

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

s. l d.
3 Upper Cayugas. 1 Hen Hawk's son, ...
6
2
CC
4
2 James Cayuga,
...
... 1 18
3 Aaron Cayuga,
...
6
‘1!.• 2
CC
6
4 Gonnaweahtanigh Cayuga, ... 3 13
Ci
117
5 Atawakon Cayuga, ...
... 3
3
CC
8
6 Kayaenghue,
7
••.,.,, 4
•••
9
7 Peter Green's wife, ...
•••• 0 15
C'
20
8 Takaghuyotontye, ...
... 4 13

Carried over, ...

£ 20

4 Hen Hawk's son, his + mark.
3/-Joseph, his + mark.
4 Joseph Dockstater, his ± mark.
4 J. Martin.
7i Kagariraes, her ± mark.
7 Christiana, her + mark.
5 Mary Green, her + mark.
7 Joseph Dockstater, his ± mark

3 11

( G. G. G. )
22d March.

8 Victories.
Appendix •

Appendix

PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants, &c.—( Continued.)

(G. G. G.)
22d March.

A. 1844-5.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

d

22d March.

Individual

as
C.)

Tribe.

Amount.

Names of Claimants.

(G. G. G.)

Third Payment.

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

•

d.
•..--

Brought over,

20

3

11

1
2
2
2
3
6
9
4
4
1

7

0 J. Martin.
41J. Martin.
al Joseph, his + mark.
10 Elizabeth Crawford, her
mark.
6 J. Martin.
6 Mrs. Whinney, her + mark.
91 Mrs. Whinney, her + mark.
61 Cayuga George, his + mark.
9 Fish Carrier, his + mark.
10 J. Martin.
2/ J. Martin.
ot J. Martin.
1 J. Jacob, his + mark.
8 Joseph, his ± mark.
3/ General, his + mark.
6 John, his + mark.
6 Kanatwakhon, her + mark.
2 1 Esther Doctor, her + mark.

Upper Cayugas. 9 Showeghsowane,
CC
10 Elizabeth,
•••
.••
CC
11 Ogsurakaro,
...
...
CC
12 Adam and his wife, ... .;)...
if
13 Shagawike,
...
..
14 Mrs. Whinney,
...
...
CC
15 John Camp, for the white man,
CC
16 Aaron's mother.
...
...
GC
17 Anatarigh, ...
•••
iG
18 Kayonwanew,
...
44
19 Widow Kaheryenengtha, ...
44
20 John Hill's wife,
...
. ...
21 Wahorionti,
...
...
CC
22 Oneida Jacob and his wife, ...
CC
23 Ouranayeghtani,
5
iC
24 Shanewhatigh,
•••
i ...
CC
25 Taraweghent,
•••
7
26 Karotshera,

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30
1
2

I
13
17
5
3
16
13
8
7

1

4
11
16

10

12
13
19

0
4
0

83
7
9 Lower Cayugas. 27 George Steeltrap,
;. .,. " 1 17
...
,c
, 3, 16
28 Waoghnegonti,
40
,,
5
29 Ka gliea gn a ghs,
•••
, •.. _ 2
1
G4
2
2
30 Kaneaninegtha,
2
if
9
31 Dekaghuanuatoghuegh,
! ... 3
4
CC
0
2
32 Dehagoghsagyk,
•••
5
CG
146
CG
... 4 15
33 Tayorheasere,
•••
7
,,
34 Thanatharea, (Capt. Hainer,) {4 14
8
2
35 Fish Carrier,
.6
9
14
36 Kawra nayentas,
•••
50
K1
2 16
37 Ateneanokla,
.:
38 Deyaughteghrogeugh, ,3 11
2
,,
39 Ka ghratoto u,
•••
... 8 11
3
2
4
40 Joseph Dockstader, ...
,I1 • •
4
,,
21 17
41 George Montour
5
LC
1
14
42 Widow Sally Montour,
•••
Ci
7
it
8
43 Cayuga George, Long House, 0
8
44
9
44 John Bill,
...
... 2,
9
45 Captain Hainer's mother and
6
... 8 —14
family,
CC
... 2 3
46Josanyatyagh,
1
8
...
47 Shanawati,
... 11 10
48 Cayuga John,
3
cc
... 4 10
49 Dick's wife,
4
CC
2 12
...
50 John Harris,
51 Young Fish Carrier, ...
, ... 5 15
if
0 13
...
.52 Cayuga William,
it
1
8
53 Little Woman, a widow,
8
9
CC
4
9
54 The Young Chief, ...
70
LC
.1 16
55 The Tall Slink,
...
CC
2
if
18
56 Akadsdaraks,
3
1
3
57 Atennightha,
143
it
4
58 Samuel Van Every, ...
174
5
CC
2 5
59 Shosanetis,
6
46
0 10
60 Hickory Bush,
7
41
4
8
61 John Jacob,
8
CC
9
13
62 Witchtua,
9
1

,

-

1

1

.

91
6 John Styers, his + mark.
11 Jemima, her + mark.
4 J. Martin.
9 J. Martin.
91 John Jacob, his + mark.
1/ Warner, his + mark.
mark.
11 Young Hainer, his
1/ Dekayouwakeh, his + mark.
4. Wahotarawakhaye, his + mark.
10 Kuneas, her ± mark.
9 James Covey, his + mark.
6t Atewearimas, her + mark.
Tall Slink, his + mark.
11/ Joseph Dockstader, his + mark.
mark.
43 Mrs. Montour, her
11/ Sally Montour, her mark.
9 John Styers, his + mark.

91 John Bill, his + mark.

9/ Mrs. Montour, her + mark.
8 J. Martin._
Skanawatih, his --1-- mark.
10 John Styers, his + mark.
8/ Joseph Snake, his + mark.
61 John Harris, his + mark.
71 Peter Fish Carrier, his mark.
11 J. Martin.
91 Little Woman, her mark.
1

N J. Martin.
81 Tall Slink, his ± mark.
51 Patrick Lathom, his + mark.
mark.
11 James Goose, his
mark.
5/ Tall Slink, his
mark.
5/ John Tom, his
71 Mrs. Montour, her + mark.
0 / John Jacob, his + mark.
91 John Styers, his + mark.
1

31
£ 254 19
Amounting to Two hundred and fifty-four pounds nineteen shillings and three pence three farthings, Halifax
Currency, Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
Witnesses to the foregoing payments :—WILLIAM

MUIRHEAD,

JACOB MARTIN.

JAS. WINNIETT,

S. I.

4.

8 Victoria.
A pp endi
( G.G.G.)
72d March.

A. 1844--5

Appendix (G. G. G.) (H. II.

Appendix

No. 9.—SENECAS.
( G. G. G.)
PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awarded 22d March.
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of £1,583 6s. 8d.
is now payable.

E

Individual
Amount.

Names of Claimants.

Tribe.

hird Payment.
d.

S

.

6

7
8
9
10
11
12

1 Kaghneghtageh,
2 Kaneyakarere,
3 Tehanyotahos,

4 16
3

CC

4 Kaneyegh,

if

5 Nekaroatsa,
6 Jamieson,
7 Sameiace,

3 17
6
1
1
8
6
.5

Senecas.
CC

if
it

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

4/ William Dickson
-I- mark.
Sarah Thomas, her + mark.
7 Kanonkeritawih, his -- mark.
-2/ William Alvis.
5 3 Kanonkeritawih, his -1- mark.

0 11

11 Rachel Jamieson, her + mark.
41Kanonkeritawili, his + mark.

8
Amounting to the sum of Twenty-six pounds eight shillings and five pence three farthings, IIalifax Currency,

Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
Witnesses to the foregoing payments :—WILLIAM

JAS. WINNIETT,

MUIRHEAD,

S. I. A.

JACOB MARTIN.

(Copy.)
DISTRIBUTION of £664 17s. 6d., being the proportion of the third and last Instalment,
£ 1,583 Gs. 8d., due to the undermentioned Indian Tribes.
Amount of Claim.

TRIBE,

A sr d.
Moravians,
...
....
.Ottawas and Chippawas,
Shawnees,
...
...
...
...
H uron, Seneca and Cayuga, ...

•• •
•• •

•••

•••

•••

1182
0
0
408 0 0
97 15
0
0
1715 10
50 10 0

666
228
59
960
28

10
4
9

21 227 19 6
2
78 ,. 3
0
20 7 1:
51 328 12 3i
2/
9 14 91Z

X 345 3 151 0

1942

16

Di 664 :17

.

(Signed )

INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Sum allowed. Sum now payable.
•
4:
d. • £

)

9

1

6/

GEO IRONSIDIty

Amherstburgh, 30th April, 1837.

S. I. A.

RETURN
Appendix To an Address from the Legislative Assembly, to His Excellency the Governor General,

(H.H.H.)
------,L._..A___Th
22d March.

bear-

-

-

-

Appendix

ing date the 10th ultimo, praying for a Return of the Tonnage and number of Ships and (H.I LH.)
other vessels owned
in this Province in the year 1844, distinguishing as nearly as may be, (-----1---,
_
those employed on the Lakes, those on the River St. Lawrence above Quebec, 22d March.
those in the Coasting Trade below Quebec and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and those in the
Trade beyond the Seas, as nearly as can be ascertained ; Steamers from vessels navigated
by sails; the ports or places in this Province to which such vessels respectively belong,
and the number of seamen employed.
By Command,
SECRETARY'S OFFICE,
Montreal, 22d March, 1815,
D. DALY, Secy.
Letter from the Deputy Inspector General to the Provincial Secretary:
INSPECTOR GENERAL'S OFFICE, Montreal, 20th March, 1845.
SIR,--I have the honor herewith to transmit a Return of the Tonnage and number of vessels owned in
this Province, distinguishing those employed on the Lakes, those in the River St. Lawrence between Montreal
and Kingston, and on the Rideau Canal, those in the River St. Lawrence above Quebec, those in the Coasting
Trade below Quebec and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and those in Trade beyond the Seas, as nearly as can be
ascertained, as required by an Address from the Honorable the Legislative Assembly,. :
10th February, 1844-,
herewith returned. I have the honor to be, Sir,
Your most obedient servant,
JOSEPH CARY,
D
Honorable D. DALY, Provincial Secretary.
Deputy Inspector General.
-

2 I

P" j

=e-•,.

RETURN Of the Tonnage and number of Ships and other Vessels owned in this Province in the year 1844, distinguishing as nearly as may be, those employed
on the Lakes, those in the River St. Lawrence above Quebec, those in the Coasting Trade below Quebec and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and those in
Trade beyond the Seas, as nearly as can be ascertained, &c., furnished pursuant to an Address from the Honorable the Legislative Assembly of 10th
February, 1845.
Employed on the Lakes.
Ports -or Places in this
Province to which the
Vessels belong.

Steamers.

Sailing Vessels.

On River St. Lawrence above
Quebec.

On the River St. Lawrence be- In the Coasting Trade below
Quebec and in the Gulf of St.
tween Montreal & Kingston
Lawrence.
and on the Rideau Canal.

Remarks,

Sailing Vessels,
Barges, &c.

Steamers.

In Trade beyond the Seas.

Barges.

Steamers.

Sailing Vessels.

Steamers.

Steamers.

Sailing Vessels.

No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men.
Quebec,
...
New-Carlisle,
...
Montreal,
Between Montreal &
Kingston on the River St. Lawrence &
on the Rideau Canal,
...

16 1545 101 112

7407 544

20 4634 313 21

3147 142

339 16031 1310
7
307 28
903 63
17

.1 •

53 27425 868
•••
..•
2 1213 38

36 3496 443 123 7242 637
(This item is founded on the Returns
of Vessels payingLight House Duty,
navigating the Lakes, there being
no registry.

about

Ports in Upper Canada, 14 3133
Total, ...

14 3133 ••••

120 8967
120 8967

•• •

•• •

•• •

•••

63 17241 1401

36 6179 414 133 10754 686 36 3496 443 123 7242 :637

55 28638 906

RECAPITULATION.
Sailing Vessels,
Bars, &c.

Steamers.
Where employed, &c,

On the Lakes,
...
...
On the River St. Lawrence above Quebec,
On the River St. Lawrence between Montreal and Kingston and on the Rideau Canal,
In the Coasting Trade below Quebec and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence,...
In Trade beyond the Seas, ...
Total,

•.!

No.

Tons.

14
36
36

3133
6179
3496

Men,

86

12808

'

No. Tons. Men.

414
443

about
120 8967
133 10754
123 7242
363 17241
55 28638

686
637
1401
906

857

794 72842

3630

.t.
...•

Remarks.

Vessels paying Tonnage Duty, navigating the Lakes.

INSPECTOR GENERAL'S OFFICE,

Montreal, 20th March, 1845.
JOS. CARY,

Deputy Inspector General.

8 Victorioe.

Appendix (I. 1. I.)

A 1844-5.

Appendix
L I.)

Appendix
I. I.)

24th March.

RETURN

24th March.

To an Address from the Legislative Assembly to His Excellency the Governor General, bearing date the 12th December, 1844, praying for a Statement of the number of Suits brought
in the Court of Chancery since 19th July, 1841, shewing the number of suits actually adjudicated upon, the amount of costs taxed, and allowed on each suit, and the amount of
fees paid on each suit to the Registrar, together with a detailed Statement exhibiting the
aggregate sums received by that Officer, by way of fees and charges on the said suits.
SECRETARY'S OFFICE,
Montreal, 24th March, 1845.

Letter from the Registrar of the Court of Chancery to the Provincial Secretary, with two Enclosures.
REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, COURT OF CHANCERY,

Toronto, 17th March, 1845.
SIR,--I beg to transmit you herewith, a Statement of
the number of Suits instituted in the Court of Chancery, between the 19th day of July, 1841, and the 12th
day of December, 1844, and of the number of Suits
adjudicated upon during the same period ; also a Return
of such costs as have been taxed during the same period, and the amount of Registrar's Fees during the
first and last years of that period. The Suits in which
costs have been taxed do not by any means embrace
the whole number of Suits in which proceedings have
been had during the period referred to, costs being frequently settled without taxation, and in the majority of
cases the costs of unsuccessful parties are not taxed.
Judging from the amount of Registrar's Fees during
the two years referred to, I should infer that costs are
taxed only in about one instance out of three or four
in which they are incurred. The aggregate of the Registrar's Fees therefore, as appearing from the taxation
of costs, will furnish no information as to the amount of
the Fees actually derived from his office. The aggregate
amount will appear by the Returns of the emoluments
of the office; and for the accuracy of the Returns since
I have held the office, I can vouch.

In omitting the Return of Registrar's Fees for the
period between the first and last years, I am aware
that I have not strictly followed the terms of your letter, but in explanation, I beg to say that I have been
prevented by illness from making the Return so soon as
I otherwise should have done,—that since my recovery
I have devoted to it and to my office, almost more time
and labor than my heath (imperfectly restored) could
warrant, and I was unwilling to make the further delay
which would necessarily occur in supplying the part
omitted,—every bill of costs requiring to be examined
throughout, in order to ascertain the amount of Registrar's fees contained therein. The Return enclosed exhibits the relative proportion between the Registrar's.
Fees and the general costs, during, the first and last
years ; the proportion during the former period being
about one third larger than during the latter, although
the greater portion of the proceedings in the more expensive suits, taxed during the latter period, occurred
during the former. In future the difference will be
still greater. In future also, there can be no doubt that
the costs in suits in Chancery will be materially diminished.,

By Command,

a

DALY, Secy.

I believe the Return of Registrar's Fees, during the
omitted period, would furnish no additional information,
but, if required, I will prepare such Return with as little
delay as possible.
I have the honor to be, Sir,
Your obedient servant,
J. G. SPRAGGE,
ca

Registrar.

The Honble. D. DALY,
Secretary of the Province,
&c. &c. &c.,

First Enclosure.
A STATEMENT of the number of Suits brought in
the Court of Chancery from the 19th day of July, 1841,
to the 12th day of December, 1844, shewing the number of Suits actually adjudicated upon—also a Schedule
of costs taxed during the same period, and the amount
of Fees paid to the Registrar during the first and also
during the last years of the same period, in the suits in
which costs have been so taxed, exhibiting the aggregate sums received by that officer by way of Fees and
charges in the said suits during the said first and last
years of the same period :
'

*umber of Suits brought in the Court of Chancery, from 19th July, 1841, to 12th De- 463
cember, 1844 ...................................................
ber of Suits adjudicated upon during the
same period, .................................................. 155
It should be explained that Suits are frequently disposed of in effect, otherwise than by a formal adjudication upon the hearing—the argument of pleas and
demurrers—the granting or refusing of special injunctions, both parties being heard—motions to dissolve special injunction, and some other applications to the
Court where the law and merits of the case are brought
in question, frequently though not necessarily have the
effect of a formal decision, the unsuccessful party not
choosing to risk further proceedings. These are, of
course, not embraced in the number above given of
Ras adjudicated upon.
It frequently occurs also that a Plaintiff finding after
answer, and perhaps after evidence gone into, that his
case cannot be sustained, forbears to proceed, and the
Suit is afterwards dismissed for want of prosecution.
In-these ways, many Suits are disposed of without a regular adjudication.
J. G. SPRAGGE,.

•

•

A. 1844-5.

Appendix (I. I. I.)

8 Vietorme.

Appendix

Appendix

(Second Enclosure.)

(I. I. I.)

(I. I. I.)

of Taxations in Chancery, from the 22nd day of July, 1841, to 31st day of December, 1844..

fareh. SCHEDULE
e4r-11-'1:--

•

s.

d.

"

8
0 0
9 17 3
1r 17
47 18 2
7
78
,

;

,

4.0--

.

33
30
32
11
48
56
18
20

11
32
7
19

1 a

4
.1

15

6

1 236

18

0

7. 11
18
3
8
14
6
4
1
2
4
14 17
6..
7
42 12
8
7
104
42 13
24 11 1 11
58 _ 0
8
21 /5
2
20 10 5
33
4
012
9 9
16
815 12
1
6 14 .7
30
4. '6,
26 16 in
3
41
5
19 15
5
22
5 11
2
28
-07 '8
737
2
12
7
4
23 8 2

78

a. d.
7
0
0 15 2
0 17 4
2
!P
4
S 16 6
11
14 10
I
12

•
-4c

s„.
15

et.

M`Lelland vs. Lyon, ...
6 I Scott vs. Ketchum, .....
12 12
1
9
8
Moffatt vs. O'Reilly,
1
4
12 12
vs. McDougall,
8
8
Covert vs. Bank of Upper
c 6 vs. Ranier,
4
Canada
2
13
' vs, Munshaw,
2
15 12
Robertson vs. Loring, ...
11
...
3
0
6
8 I Ross vs. Martin,
9
McKenzie vs. Kerby, ...
19 lb Lee vs. McNaughton,
28
0
0c1
Burnham vs. Leihshitz,
6 Fish vs. Burnside, ...
14
52
8
0 I 4
Covert vs. Bank of Upper
Hiscott vs. Berruyer,
Canada, ...
9 11 Adams vs. Morton, ...
6 4 10
Davis vs. Commercial Bank,
10
4
0
2' Kilborn vs. Flint, ...
7 8
Robertson vs. Bell, ...
14 11"
9
9
93 18
• .—
Edgar vs. Chambers,
39 -0
1
1
8 10
Cull vs. Boyer, ...
7 •18
3
0
4 ".*
Crooks vs. Dickson, ...
.
23 17
2'
4
3 10 Smith vs. Manahan,
Humphrey vs. Hodgson, ...I
4
1
19 13
2r
3 Smith vs. Simpson,...
Leslie vs. Hinds,
18 16 11
1
17
2 Counter vs. McPherson, ...
Dougall vs. Spragge,
Scott vs. Waddle,
... 6
11 17
2
0.
..,
Parrott vs. Davy,
...
17 12
8
r
18 Ag M`Donell vs. Jackson,
Demorest vs. Carpenter;;
McClure vs. Bassett, ...
3
9 166
1
Molson vs. Crooks, ...
22 19
5
2
6
6 Andruss vs. Sheldon,
Finlay vs. McDonald, ...
...
4 17 3
0 Sheldon vs. Andruss,
0
6
,
Same vs. Same,
3 6
0
0 Sheldon vs. Loder,
90
Same vs. Same,
.
10
16
0
4 Tribe vs. McKenzie,
7 10
.
McIntosh vs. Gifford,
4
38 4 7
5 Biscoe vs. Chamberlain,
3Same vs. Same, ...
13
1
8
7
11
6 Roberts vs. Saxon, ...
Finlay vs. McDonald, ...
3 5 1 0 0 I 0 0 Benson vs. Bagg,
Commercial Bank vs. McBaldwin vs. Walker,
Lean,
. •
„.
1
14
2
19- 16 M'Nab vs. Middleton,
Same vs. Same,. ...
...
12
1
1
1
2
2 In re Street,
Sinclair vs. Arnold, ••• •
3
10
5
0
15 10
Mosier vs. Hunter,. ...
0
44 11
4
9
8 McLeod v . McDonell,
Clapp vs. Clapp,. —.
6
17 17
1
10
4 Taylor vs. Elmsley,
Holmes vs. Perry,- —.
1
48 16
4 10
8, Rhodes vs. Lawder,
Bradbury vs. Hurd, ...
53
0 10' 4
9 Foot vs. Latnphier,
7
Black vs. Thompson, ...
.. 1
9
22
5
6
4
3 Court vs. McDonald,
Jarvis vs. Hamilton, ...
McGill vs. Knott,
...
42 15
6
3
3
1
Burnside vs. Fish,
28 14
3
2 7 Wardropp vs. Brown, ...
Steen vs. Hubbell, .,
Crooks vs. Bemis,
... ;
9 8
I
18
11
Yale vs. Alderman,
Same cause,
... ... ...
21 10 8
2
16
Crooks vs. Macitab, .;.
27
9 11
6 Coml. Bank vs. Fisher, ...
3
4
9' In re Handley, a Lunatic t-Coml. Bank vs. Parker, , ..„ .19 11 7
1
1,7
McDougall vs. Robertson,,
'General costs of " Trustees:
12.
5
7
Malony vs. Malony,
£51 4 4
23
9
3: 13
Same vs. Same, ...
27 3 1
4
6
5
O
2
Malony vs. Martin,
8 9
18
3
2
Same vs. Same, ...
Costs of J. C Tildesly,
5 4 °8
2
O
Riddell vs. Ridout,
7 ..•6, one of the Trustees:
19
6 ,7
2
Chew vs. Clifford,
£5 16 7
A
2
17
.1
Hector vs. Powell,
4 19 10
3
8 9
...
Playter vs. Wells,
12 2
17 7 10
7
1
Same vs. Same, ...
6 2
6 18
O ta
Brooke vs. Carey,
'34 10
2
16
Ridout vs. C. M. & N. J.Ives, 138 14
Costs of Robert IL nu, a
12
4
1
Wilson vs. Wilson, ...,
4 retiring Trustee :
4
52 1'3
4 , 6
Same vs. Same, ...
£7 1
2
•34 10 5
6 1
Mosier vs. Hunter, ...
3
a7
71
5
0
4 11
5
McIntosh vs. McIntosh,
7 13 9
25 2 g
2
2
Same cause,
...
10 5 0
8
16
O
Baby vs. Strachan,
:4.04 Jan 9 10 6
01.
;6
Costs of the wife of the
5
Tribe vs. McKenzie, ... ,,„
'Lunatic :
7,1 1 5
Anglin vs.'M'Intosh,
£16 15 9
,, 1
2
.9
McKenzie vs. Tribe, ... 61 13 6,
12 '12
10
6
Leeming vs. The Desjardins Canal Companf,
1 73 1196 41
3 fit
1
2
6
Same cause,
...
11
0
3
0
Flint vs. Danl. Jones,
. osts of G.S. Boulton one
e
2
61 16 11
6
Same cause, ...
0 -the Trustees :
15 19. 10
1
6
Flint vs. J. E. Jones,,, :
le 16 5
£40 17 6
. it'
.b,,
Same cause,
...
-15 19 10
30 1PO• 11
1
-6
Forsyth vs. Gamble, ...
Q,; 4
4 19 11
45 46
Hart vs. Wilson, ...
28 18 10.
3, 17
.8
Norman vs. Andruss,... .
7
1 Wardropp vs. Brown, ...
79 18 3,
3
Counter vs. McPherson, ... 110 14 TO
18 10 McLeod vs. McDonell,
4
Ross vs. Martin, ...
.
O
16 10 Wilson vs. Johnston, ...
3 13 5
Drew vs. Vansittart,
159
8
... ... ...
t ' s 13 •- 4 Same cause,
Blore vs. Thompson, ...
13. ., 5 McDonell vs. Jackson,
36 13
....
Empey vs. Loucks, ...
68
16
Charles vs. Westmacott, ...
Kirby vs. Young,
...
19
13' 'to Same cause,
2'
... ... .
Fish vs. Burnside,,
5 18 1
... ...
8. '2 Same cause,
O
, ,
Kennedy vs. M
28 15
6 ' 10 - Molson vs. Crooks, ...
Anderson vs, Ryan, ...
17 18
14,_ 11)- •r t 1. Strange vs. Wragg, ... '''.
Lee vs. M`Naughton,...
0
35
1
4- Same vs. Same, ... ...
0
3
Drew vs. Vansittart,
14 2
6
8 Lyons vs. Chisholm, ...
1
6

24th arch.

Appendix (I. I. I.)

8 Vietoriw.
Appendix
(I. T. 1.)

. SCHEDULE

A. 1844-5.
Appendix

of Taxations in Chancery, &c.—(Continued.)

(I. I. I.)

r-- -Th
24th March

General Costs. 'Registrar's Fees.

£

s.

d.

s.

General Costs. Registrar's Fees.

d.

X

s.

.•£

d.

8.

d.

Hooper vs.
•••
Lyons vs. Chisholm & Wife, 20 6
5
Carpenter vs. Demorest ... : .1V5
Hess vs. M`Kenzie, ... ...
38
3
9
1Baby vs. Baby, ... ... — ;..Sp ,11
Wardropp vs. Brown, ... ••• . 6 , , 4 10
I Mowat vs. Harne ... ••
... ...
Berford vs. Lewis,
17 10 10
20 17
I
Beasley vs. Cahill,'
Ritchie vs. Burns,
••• - a 7 * 7-9 . 4 10
••••ii,,v) -to • ,• 0
In re M`Donell,
Warren vs. Elinsfey, ... .
06 17
3
...' . •
24
6
2
. Smith vs. M‘Quarry, • .00 14
Taylor vs. Same,
... ... 0;4 13
5
17 )1
7Chambers vs. Hall, ... ...
M‘Kay vs. Borde,
. .. .8
25
9
19 14
1
Burnham vs. Bedford,... u.;
Sutherland vs. Sumner,
10 16 . .8
18 18
8
.
Mowat vs. Carscallan,
... 21 12
6
Hancox vs. M‘Lean, ... ..
Robertson vs. Bell, ... s••• = 19 14
1
27 11
.16
0
Ilineks vs. M'Elderry,
...
Same vs. Same. ... ...
18 , 9
1
9
11
.8
_ . 1.9 13 10
i1
1
M‘Glashen vs. Thompson,... 138 '. 2 1
7
Robertson vs. RR, ...%
' 18 11
.2
9
0
so 14
Cahill vs. Beasley, ... ..
4
4
o
1
7
0
0
-1
M‘Millan vs. Welland Canal
0
17
12
11
14
8
Att.
Gen.
vs.
Sutherland,
—
... ...
23 10. 10
Company,
..
0
1
16 10
0
14
)
5 baby vs. Lewis, ••• ••• -••
Ogilvie vs. Hogg,
•.• ••• 100 13
9
0
0
0
3
3
5
In re Street.
... ........,.
6
28 - 10) 4
0
15
I 1"
.
1 4 6
Baker vs. Scriven ,.. .... i...
Lockhart vs. Patrick,
1
...
15 12
1 1 1'12
9
3
5
6
Bowly vs. Langs,
....; ..
1,8
Lockhart vs. Turner, ..• ,.. (Alg 0) i /.•-.
1
1Smith vs. Chisholm, ..: ...
Gregg vs. Townsley, ... ...
12
5
6
15
1
0
t
69
63
1Beasley vs. Cahill,
..
M`Laren vs. Anderson,
2
...11,11f, 4.is
19•
6
2
0
5
2
1
Chambers vs. Hall, ... — . 21
Wilson vs. Hollingshead, ...
24 10
6
1 11
0
5 10
1
8 11
Comfort vs. Comfort,...
Charles vs. Hickson, ... .. •
20
118 10 10
1
1
0
2Burns vs. M'Kenzie, ...
Whitta vs. Bellnap, ...
7 16
24
6
5
0
6 10
Drew
vs.
Vansittart,
...
Hurd vs. Bonnycastle,
6 10
282
3
7 10
17
8
1-0
4
t2
Smith vs. Cullen,
In re Wilson—In fault,
.•.
4s 11- -12 4 ,, - '
11
1
0
4
,,
9
Handlin vs. Gram, .
8 10
68
,1 12
•
,,
'l
0
•••
5
2
16
6
7
4
:
6
I} i
4
-••
••
Humphrey vs. Street,...
9
16 13
49
3
Waite vs. Place, ... ...
•••
22
17
7
8
9
0
1 10
•••
20 16
3
5
1
7 lo
9
2)
,2
Com. Bank vs. Richardson, 39 16
7
•••
11
7
4
1
0
0
O'Neil vs. Wilson,
... ••••
Same vs. Same ... ... ... (20 .13 . $,
21
6
2
0
12
2,
Gerard vs. Muirhead,... ,
M`Millan vs. Welland Can'al
35
4
/
3
7 , 0
;)
,,
.• ::
....
...
.. ..
Company,
3 '10
13
9
5
1
4
, : ,,tit Hostler vs. Ball,
Sutherland vs. Sumner,
... •••
47
50 10
4
9•
1
3
0
0
.,
,2
Rhodes vs. Lawder, .•. .•
13 17 .11)1.
31.11
i7
6
7
0
9
8
Glass vs. Mattheson, ...
vs. Silterthorn,...
i
19 11
.1,
0
.4
8
8
1
tfi') Silverthorn
2)
••• •••
Smyth
vs. Manahan, ...
1 11
15
5
27 15
8
0
6
8
Proudfoot vs. M`Gill,...
8
34 10
•••
25
8
3
0
9
4
Waite vs. Place, ... ...
••• •.. •BO
2
4
12
1
0
2
6
3
11
/7
7
5
1
5
M‘Leod vs. Mitchell, .., •.
••• ••• ••
25
7
7
428
0
M'Glashen vs. Thompson,— 54
Whitta vs. M`Intosh, ... .,
9
5 ,
9
4 , 4
0.
_
,,, 11 11i N1 •
Cary vs. Crandle
Johnston vs. Cameron,
...
22 ,5
$,
li
5
1
Coml. Bank vs. Ross,
Silverthorn vs. Silverthorn:.?:.
6
61 '18'
1
3 111
17
),
3
19
2
... ...
Shaw vs. Huffman,
"41 16
0. 9
.14
Coml. Bank vs. M‘Laren, ...
Ca 12 . • * • •..=
Fisher vs. M'Creaye, ....
1181 19
2
'6'
13
••
;•
In re Street,
... ... ...
1..
8 18
...2` .,
1
14
8
•• - -....11 11,27
,.
Baby
vs.
Miller,
••• ••• •••
6 18
8=
22 16
9
4
17
Cathcart vs. Stinson,•
Demorest vs. Carpenter, ...
4 H
23
4 10
8
0
5
4
In re Wilson,
... ...
Hill vs. Hubbs,
••• •
1
25 11
41 18
9
2
1
6
... ...
Same matter,
Gore Bank vs. Digby,...
12
9'
2 •
19*
2
71
18
7
Same matter,
... ...
Ferguson vs. Post, ...
4
5
2
3
1
0
0
5 11
Humphrey vs. Street,
..•
Ferrie vs. Keith,
2•
8
9
49
22 11
0
1
9 11
17
3In re Street,
... ...
20 16
12 14
5
0
•••
O'Beirne vs. Gillet, ...
.
4
7
11
14
1
14254
ilearnes vs. Wismer, ... 1
oks, ... ••
6
5
3
■■ q
Gil
Gilmour
vs. Crooks,
29
1
10
4
0
_
Robertson vs. Bell, ... ...Stinson vs. Irvine,
...
12
5 10,
5.
12 14
rt.
1
2
6
Andruss vs. Sheldon, ... . ..
M`Leod
vs.
M'Leod,
...
—
'9 14
4
34
3
1
2
8
8
I
...
Adamson
vs.
Keefer,
...
9 13
7
•
,19 15
2
1
18 10
,
Clement vs. Downer, .•.
Bloor
vs.
Bank
U.
C....
12 14
4
14 10
5
0
15
,,
0
Same cause,
... ..• •••
'3 12 10
.
•••
14 15
2
2
0
6
Riley vs. Smyth,
•••
Gott vs. Roxburgh, ... •
36 14
3
30
0
8
2ts 4
5
Robertson vs. Bell, ... ...
Young vs. Montgomery, .
4
80
10
1
8
8
0
13
9
),
Shaw vs. Burrell,
... •
77
494
16 _ 8
3
0
6
7
2
f7
4 '.
11.," Humphrey vs. Street,... ...
•• .
3
I
. 7
17
9
7
0
1
10
- um Smith vs.
'27' 0 11 - 14
7
7
2
1
0
Drummond vs. M`Donell, ..
86 16
7
36
9 10
3
0
0
,•
• OS •••
33 18
7
8
14
0
0
7
8
Charles vs. Wright, ...
Cullen vs. Price,
s
18 10
... ...
5
12
1
0
7
17 10
.
..• .••
Same cause,
••• •••
9 12 7 4
14
8
0
0
16
7
Ford vs. Teeples,
... ...
21
In re Merritt, alleged Bank2
6
Forsyth vs. Wintermute, .••
17 14•
rapt,
... ••• ..• 0.
41
1
1
2
6
B. A. Assurance Co. vs.
Baldwin vs. Walker, ...
•.
19 15
0
0
17
4
Griffith, ... ... — ...
19
—.9 I 3 112
£ 1757
-

•••

)

•••

,,

,,

1,,

Alba

11

7/

•.•

•••

,)

•••

79

19

17

77

;)

•••

.0,,

17

17

7/

Vie

47

71

"
/7

7)

17

If

'

'

17

J. G. SPRAGGE, •

Registrar,

24th March.

8 Victoria;.

Appendix (J. J. J.)

A. 1844-5.
A ppendix

Appendix

4

(J. J. J.)

(Second Enclosure.)

(J. J. J.)
4th March.

STATEMENT of the Cost and Dimensions of the Welland Canal to the Twelfth Lock,
of the lateral cut to the Town of Niagara.

and 24th

.0■•■=wm■•01.

CONTRACTORS NAMES AND NUMBERS OF
AMOUNT PAID. TOTAL AMOUNT. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. QUANTITY.
LOCKS.
'

s. d.

s. d.

1 6894 0 0
Sherwood & Buell, ...
... 2 2265 0 0
Brown & McDonell,
... final, 3 to 6 37255 5 9
Geo. Barnett, ...
W. Courtwright & Co. ... do. 7 and 8 19134 5 0
... 9 to 12 34472 1 0
E W. Thompson & Co.
,.. 2750 0 0
Lock Gates, ...
3295 10 10
Moore & Cromwell, waste weirs, ...
R. M. Boyle, ...
do. do.
... .:. 1245 0 0
Waste weir, Port Dalhousie,—
G. Barnett, Earth Excavation in reaches, 3556 9 6
Courtwright & Co. do. do. ... 1459 4 6
Higham & Co. do. below St. Catherines, 2343 0 0
Cotton & Rowe, Dredg ng,
Russell Piers, Port Dalhousie,
...
Land Damages, Saw Mills, &c.
2531 0 0
Superintendence, ...
... 2000 0 0
Moore & Cromwell, floating tow path, ...

17475 0 0
12326 0 0
37255 5 9
19134 5 0
35950 1 0
7000 0 0
3750 0 0
2100 0 0
1200 0 0
4956 9 6
2173 4 6
5000 0 0
5541 12 9
12000 0 0
2531 0 0
3000 0 0
3393 0 0

PRICE.

I AMOUNT.
£

Earth Excavation, ...
Masonry for 13 Locks,
Foundations for do.
Lock Gates,

1s. 62000 0 0

49369

40s. 98792 0 0

13

13000 0 0
6500 0 0

...

Waste Weirs, ...
Culverts,
Land
acres,
C ontingencies, 10 r cent.

s. d.

1240000

13 £651

8463 0 0

18000 0 0
6
329 £12 10s. 4112 10 0
21086 0 0

I' 119200 16 7 174785 18 6
51167 11 6
Difference in favor of Welland Canal, ...
231953 10 0

Locks 2-200 X 45
Do. 10-150 X 261
12 feet, 1 mile.
Depth of Water, 10 do. 31 do.
9 do. 22 do.
i to A mile for 2 miles.
70 feet do. 3 do-.
Width of bottom,
45 do. do. 2 do. t
Width of tow path, 15 feet on top.
Do. berm bank, 12 do. do.
Side slopes, 2 to 1.
Total length 7 miles.
Rise 145 feet.
This Statement shews the extent of the Steamboat
navigation.

£1231953 10 0

Locks 13-150 X 26A
Depth of water, 9 feet.
Width of bottom, 45 feet.
Width of towing path, 15 feet on top.
Do. berm bank,
12 do.
do.
Side slopes, 2 to 1.
Total length, 111 miles.
Rise, 145 feet.
The prices assumed in this Estimate are the result
of the most careful consideration, and the very extensive observations which there has been an opportunity
of making on the actual cost of similar works.
In no instance has the value of the work on the
Welland been over-estimated.

( Third Enclosure.)
WELLAND CANAL OFFICE,

I

directed one of my assistants (Mr. Slater) to take

St. Catherines, 6th March, 1845. the levels of the line which was evidently most favorable for the construction of a Canal ; other and more
have the honor to acknowledge the receipt urgent duties prevented this gentleman from at once
of your letter of the 22nd, enclosing the Resolution of attending to this business, and he was unable to cornthe House of Assembly requiring certain information plete the Survey until the latter part of October, when
respecting the proposed lateral cut from the Welland he entered Niagara on one of the Polling days; it has,
Canal to the Town of Niagara. (I believe) been asserted with an intention to influence
the election against the gentleman who has now the
I have, therefore, to submit the following Statement, honor to represent that Town. It does not seem possible
which will, I trust, satisfactorily explain all the matters that the appearance of this officer could have exercised
adverted to in the Resolution. any influence on the election,—certainly it could not
have produced nor have been intended to produce such
On the 25th September, I was instructed by the an effect as that attributed to it, for it was well known
Chairman of the Board of Works to make the Survey that the Survey was made in compliance with the reand take the levels necessary for ascertaining the cost quest of many of the most respectable inhabitants, supof the proposed Canal, in compliance (as 1 understood) porters of the successful candidate, to defeat whom was
with a request formerly made by Mr. Cayley and other the alleged object of the Survey. I shall merely say
gentlemen resident in Niagara. that the selection of that day was purely accidental, the
officer alluded to did not even know that it was one
I accordingly examined the ground lying between of the Polling days, so little interest did he feel in the
that Town and a point situated at the head of the matter.
twelfth Lock from Port Dalhousie, where the Welland
The plan which I have already forwarded to the
Canal emerges from the valley of Dick's Creek ; the
cost of the additional Locks was a sufficient objection to Board, with the memoranda and estimates thereto atthe selection of any point higher up, and the height of tached, exhibits all the information acquired by the
the table land between St. Catherines and Niagara Survey ; it shews that the ground between the points
precluded the possibility of leaving the Canal lower abovementioned is exceedingly favorable for the locadown. tion of a Canal, the line of which (marked blue on the

march.

8 Vietoriw.

Appendix (J..1. J.)

Appendix
( J. J. J. ) plan) may be straight throughout, proceeding in a direct
line from its departure from the Welland to its junction
j
with the Niagara river. No obstacle whatever is pre24 th Much
.
sented, except by the valleys of the creeks which empty themselves into the lake between the mouth of the
Niagara and Port Dalhousie, of which the Four and
and Ten Mile Creeks can alone be considered formi
dable, and the expense of crossing even these is not
considerable, being much less than that of the additional lockage and excavation which would be caused by
the attempt to avoid those ravines by a line situated
near the main ridge. The line for nine miles passes
through that portion of the country denominated the
Swamp, generally in the vicinity of the main road, and
reaches the Niagara River immediately below Fort
George, this point being selected as the entrance, for
the reasons formerly assigned by Mr. Roy, " that the
" current is too rapid for a safe harbour above, and be" low it would be exposed to the swells of the lake."
The accompanying Schedule shews the cost of the
proposed Canal, and also that part of the Welland situated between No. 12 and Port Dalhousie, including
the construction of that Harbour. It proves that the
expense of the latter is at least £57,000 less than that
of the former could have been : thus regard for economy must have induced the Board of Works, as well as
the Welland Canal Company, to select Port Dalhousie
as the entrance, in preference to the mouth of the Nia 7
gara ; but there are many more important reasons
which must have exercised an influence on their deciL
sion. The length of the Canal from Port Dalhousie to
No. 12 is seven miles—that of the proposed cut from
the same point to Niagara is 114,—thus, the increased
length of the route, and consequently the increased cost
of transportation and loss of time, as well as the additional
expense of maintainance, are serious objections. Although the Harbour of the Niagara River may possess
some natural advantages, such as great depth of water,
sufficient extent and tolerable shelter, it is, nevertheless,
very inferior to the new Harbour about to be constructed at Port Dalhousie ; its defenceless position on the
frontier, is an insurmountable objection—the entrance
to the Canal would, in the event of a war, be exposed
to instant destruction from the guns of the American .
Fort ; but apart from this, it labours under other serious
defects, the removal of which is beyond the reach of
art. When there are light winds from the southerly
points, the rapid current renders the entrance very difficult ; and when the wind is from the northerly point
and, therefore, apparently favorable for the entrance of
vessels, the swell caused by the meeting of the waves
from the lake and the current of the river, is attended with great danger. To its exposed situation in the
event of war, and the difficulty of entrance during
the prevailing summer winds (from the south) must be
added the great danger arising from the floating ice
late in the spring,—and the existence of a shifting bar
at the mouth, which circumscribes the channel so far
as to render the egress of vessels both difficult and
dangerous when the wind is northerly.
The Harbour at Port Dalhousie will possess almost
unrivalled advantages. Accessible at all times, it will
have a depth of twelve feet water at its entrance ; an
outer and well sheltered Harbour more than half a mile
in length, amply sufficient for the accommodation of the
trade, to which must be added the extraordinary advantage of its inner Harbour, two miles long and nearly
half a mile wide, sufficiently large to contain all the
vessels on both lakes ; completely sheltered by the
surrounding hills, and raised by the first Lock above the
influence of the lake, so that the water can scarcely be
agitated during the most violent storms. The peculiar
facilities for the construction of a graving dock, cornbitted with the extent and security of this inner Harbour,
will, doubtless, at no distant period, render Port Dal-

A. 1844-5.

Appendix
housie the winter resort of a large amount of shipping (J. J. J.)
on the lakes. The location of the old piers, as well as
their plan and construction, was so faulty, that a strong 24th March.
prejudice has existed in the minds of many against this
Harbour. An examination of the plan of the new piers
will shew that, after the completion of the works now
in progress, this harbour will be free from all the defects which have been urged against it with much force
and some justice. 1 am happy to be supported in the &opinions now advanced by all the experienced masters g
0
of vessels whom I have had an opportunity of consulting.
•

co
z
a.

Co)

Appended to this Report is an account of a few of ,moo
the recent disasters arising from the above mentioned
defects in the Niagara Harbour. If so many accidents
have occurred among the few vessels that visit this
Harbour, and so few among the many that leave and/ 1
enter Port Dalhousie, defective as it at present is,
must be evident that the advantages of the latter and'
the disadvantages of the former have not been exaggerated in this Report.

Apprehensions are entertained by some, that at no
very distant period, the lower lake may become so
shallow•as to render all the works at Port Dalhousie
useless. A daily record of the levels kept by the Lock
Tender, since I have had charge of all the old works,
and the observations of the same person during fifteen
years, corroborated by those made at Fort Niagara since
1815, tend to show that the water of the lake is at
least as high now as it was many years ago, and I have
been unable to discover evidence to prove that any
change is going on rapidly, or reasons to justify us in
providing for so remote a contingency, long before the
probable occurrence of which all our works will be in
ruins.
Enough has been said to prove that, even if the selection of an entrance to the Welland were still an open
question, Port Dalhousie should be preferred on account
of the advantages of its Harbour, the shortness of the
line, and economy of construction. It therefore seems
needless at this time to make any remarks on the inexpediency of expending £230,000 on the construction of a lateral cut to Niagara, when a Canal, in
every respect more efficient than that could possibly be,
has been already constructed.
I have now furnished information on all the points
adverted to in the Resolution of the House, though not
exactly in the order there prescribed. Having first
mentioned the authority under which the Survey was
made,-2nd, the cause (as I believe) of its being
made,-3rd, the information derived from the Survey,
and the conclusion following a full examination of the
relative advantages and disadvantages of the entrances
at Port Dalhousie and Niagara, and the respective
routes from these harbours to the nearest point of the
Welland, and in connection with this, have shewn that
there is no evidence to prove that any change in the
level of the lake is going on rapidly.
I have the honor to be, Sir,
Your obedient servant,
S. POWER.
(Signed,)

•

THOMAS A. BEGLY, Esquire,
Secretary, Board of Works.
Vessels lost or driven on shore in attempting to make
Niagara Harbour :—" Thistle," " Essex," " General
Wolfe," and " Brothers."
The "Bond Head" is the only vessel which has
been wrecked at Port Dalhousie, and she was waterlogged before she neared the shore.



8 Vieto•iw.

Appendix (J. J, J.)

A. 1844-5.

Appendix

Appendix
(J. J. J.)

(J. J. J.)

RETUR N

24th March.

24th March.

To an ADDRESS from the Legislative Assembly to His Excellency the Governor General,
bearing date the 18th ultimo, praying for a Return of the amounts which have already
been expended for completing the Welland Canal from Thorold and Lock No. 18, respectively, to Port Dalhousie; the amount to be expended at Port Dalhousie for deepening
the entrance, constructing Piers, protecting Works, the annual cost of keeping the entrance
clear of sand, the depth of water there will be on the Bar when the contemplated Works
are completed, and a Statement of all necessary expenditures connected with the said
Harbour at Port Dalhousie ; with such Observations on the shallowing of the water on the
Lake, as may have been made by the Officers of the Board ; and also whether a certain
Survey, or pretended Survey, made by the subordinate Officers of the Board, during the
Polling days of the late Election for the Town of Niagara, from Thorold to the said Town,
was made under the authority of the Board of Works,—if so, the information derived by
such Survey, and the intention of the Board in making the same.
By Command,

SECRETARY'S OFFICE,
Montreal, 24th March, 1845.

D. DALY, Secy.

Letter from the Secretary of the Board of Works
to the Provincial Secretary, with three Enclosures.
BOARD OF WORKS,

Montreal, 24th March, 1845.
SIR,—Upon receipt of the Resolution of the House
of Assembly, calling for certain information as to the
cost of completing the Welland Canal from Thorold
and from the head of Lock No 18, respectively, to
Port Dalhousie, and other particulars connected therewith, the Chief Engineer in charge of the work was
immediately written to, and instructed to furnish the
details called for. These have been furnished, and I
have now the honor of enclosing them to you, in order•
that they may be presented to the House by the proper
officer.
I have the honor to be, Sir,

Your very obedient servant,
THOMAS A. BEGLY,

Secretary",
Hon D. DALY,
Provincial Secretary.

Q. The annual cost of keeping the present enA. £150. It is not probable
that this expenditure will hereafter be necessary, as all
the silt can be removed in the spring by the water discharged from the immense reservoir situated above the
first Lock.

trance clear of sand ?

—

Q. The depth of water there will be over the Bar
when the contemplated works are completed ?—A. 12
feet at low water mark.
Q. A statement of all the necessary expenditures
connected with said Harbour at Port Dalhousie ? A.
Salary of Harbour Master and Light House Keeper,
cost of maintaining Light, and other similar expenses
requisite in all harbours.
—

Q. Such observations as may have been made by the
officers of the Board relative to the shallowing of the water of the Lake.—A. A daily record of the levels kept by
the Lock Tender during the last two years, and the observations of the same person during 15 years, corroborated by those made at Fort Niagara, tend to shew that
the water is higher now than it was many years ago.
Q. Whether the recent Survey was made under the
authority of the Board of Works ? A. The Survey was
made by order of the Chairman of the Board (October
25th.)
—

(First Enclosure.)
Q. The information derived by such Survey ? A. See
Plan and Report, which shew that although the ground
between No 12 and Niagara is extremely favorable for
the location of a Canal, the_disadvantages of the
Niagara Harbours, and the greater length and cost of
this route, would, under any circumstances, have rendered its selection inexpedient.
—

proposed in a Resolution of the House of
Assembly, dated 18th February 1845.

QUESTIONS

Q. The amount already expended in reconstructing
the Welland Canal from the head of the 12th (weir)
Lock to Port Dalhousie ?—A. £119,200.
Q. FronaThorold to the same place, i. e. Port Dalhousie ? A. £211,361.
—

Q. Amount to be expended for deepening and constructing Piers at Port Dalhousie ?—A. £17,541.

Q. The intention of such survey ? A. To comply
with the request made by Mr. Cayley and other gentlemen resident in Niagara.
—

S. _POWER.

A. 1844-5.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

8 Victoria.

Appendix

Appendix

( G. G. G.)

(First Enclosure.)

G.G.G.)

No. 1.

22d March,

22d March.

LIST of War Loss Claims remaining unpaid of the 3rd or 333 per cent. Third Instalment on
the original award under Provincial Statute 4 Geo. IV, cap. 4, and 3 Will. IV, cap. 26 and
27, to be paid by monies raised on Debentures bearing interest at 5 per cent. per annum.

COMMISSIONERS' AWARD.

RESIDENCE.

NAME.

d.

s.

Alyea, John ...
Anderson, Cornelius ...
...
Bellnap, Eleanor
Benedict, Charles
Brown, Cornelius
...
Charron, Antoine
Dale, or Deal, Jacob ...
Derenzy, Elizabeth ...
...
Douglas, Thomas
Filker, John ...
Fulker, Jacob ...
Halket, Jacob ...
Keiter, Benjamin
M‘Kirgan, David
M'Fhee, Hugh
Markle, Jacob
•..
Millar, George
Morison, Charles
Nelson, William
..•
...
O'Keefe, Andrew
Penebeckor, Cornelius
•••
Playter, Eli .,.
Randal, Robert
Roger, William
Smith, Jacob
•••
••,
Sovereign, Robert
Spears, Abigail
•••
Stroud, Christian
Teetzel, John ...
Vankoughnet, John
Warren, John ...
Will, Philip ...
Wilson, John ...

GO •

•••
•••

•••

•••

•••
•••

••.

•.•
•
•••

• ••

•..,
•••
▪
•
•
•••

Ameliasburgh,
York,
Flamboro' East,
Port Talbot, ...
Bertie,
...
Belleville,
Flamboro' West,
..•
York,
York,
•••
Gainsboro',
Ancaster,
Flamboro' West,
Burford,
River Thames,
York,
Toronto,
Thorold,
Baldoon,
.•.
Nelson,
•••
York,
Moravian Town,
York,
...
Stamford,
...
Beverley,
Glanford,
Nelson,
•••
Cornwall,
...
Augusta,
...
Grimsby,
...
Cornwall,
...
D. Bertie,
Beverley,
...
Saltfleet,

•••
• ••

5
12
3
3
3

•••

•••

•••

12
12
23
15
16
20
11
12
20
22
4
3
17
150
5
13
\
4
8
5
5
6
12
3
5
506
5
13

o

311 PER CENT.

-

10
2
0
11
5
3
10
10
0

5
17
9
12
0

10

0

5

7

0
0
0
10

0
12

O
•
6
•
•
•
6
•
•
O
O
6
•
6
O

O
•
•
6
O
O
O
O
O
6

10

0

4
10

6

9
10

6
0

15

0

O

0

5

11
G
•11

10 I

0

1
4
1
1
1
1
4
4
7
5
5
6
3.
4
6

7

1
1
5
50
1
4
1
2
1
1
2
4
1

s.

d.

13

4
4
10
0
8

3
O
O
3
15
1
3
16

0
2

4
8

O

0

8
19
16
4
13
10
6

. 4
2

4
2
4
0

. 8

1

8

15

10
0
4

0

13
6
1Q
13

17

16
1
3
0

8
k3

8
-6
4

0
6
8

1

16

168
1
4

16
13
11

0

12
1
1
9
2

6
6
13
6
15

0

2
8

0
6

0
10
13

'1

10

0

.2 116 I

8

5

0

4
s

FIRST SUPPLEMENTARY RETURN
.4.

Pitts, James ..,

Louth,

•■•

SECOND SUPPLEMENTARY.
B rown,

Henry ...
Kitchen, Henry
Pearson, Andrew
Poole, Catherine
Pannier, Jean Bte.

.••

.••
•••

...

•••

York,
•••
Niagara,
Barton,
Westminster,
Sandwich,

37
4
5
28
8

Stamford,
Mersea,
Pelham,
Cornwall

6
25
5
4

8
8
4
8
0

FOURTH SUPPLEMENTARY.
Bowman, Abner,
Blan, James ...
Moor, Rachel ...
M'Bean, Gillis

•••

•••

•••

• ••

•••

...

,

4
4
6

FIFTH SUPPLEMENTARY.
Meyers, Peter ...

41 i•

.ii

Charlottenburgh,

8

Charlottenburgh,

15

_0

1120

17

SIXTH SUPPLEMENTARY.
M'Dougall, Angus

...

•••

•••

Total,

373 1 12 I

Amount unpaid, Three hundred and seventy-three pounds twelve shillings and sixpence, Currency.
RECEIVER GENERALS OFFICE,

18th February, 1845.

W. MORRIS,

R. G,

6

8 Victoriw.

A. 1844-5.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

Appendix

Appendix

( G.G.G.;

(Second Enclosure.)

(G.G.G.)

No. 2.

22d March.

22d March.

LIST of War Loss Claims remaining unpaid of the Fourth and last Instalment, being 313 per
cent. upon the original award ;—Provincial Statute 4 Geo. IV, and Joint Address of the
Legislature, 24th February, 1837.
CDMMISSIONERS3 AWARD.

RESIDENCE.

NAME.

s.

Alyea, John ...
Anderson, Cornelius ...
Bellnap, Eleanor
Benedict, Charles
Bird, William
Brown, Cornelius
Brunnor, George
Campeau, Louis
Camel, Antoine
Castor, George
...
Charron, Antoine
...
Derenzy, Elizabeth
...
Douglas, Thomas
Dubois, James
Dufour, Charles
Forsyth, Catharine
Fuller, Benjamin
Gortier, Alexis
Hainer, Margaret
o.•
Hall, James ...
Hamden, Luther
Henry, Daniel
Rainer, Frederick
Hubble, Prindle
Hutt, Adam
Inglis, George
Jackson, John
Jones, Peter ...
Kirby, George
•••
Laframboise, Pierre
...
Lagrave, Augustin
...
Livings, Richard
M'Curdy, Richard
M'Kenzie, Alexander
M'Kenzie, Alexander
M'Kenzie, John
M'Kenzie, Kenneth ...
M'Kirgan, David
...
M'Phee, Hugh, estate of
Messimore, John
...
Morden, Capt. James ...
Morrison, Charles
...
Muma, Samuel
O'Keefe, Andrew
Playter, Eli
Randal, Robert
Reneaux, Charles
Scott, Everitt
Searl, William
Smith, Jacob
Smith, John L.
Spears, Abigail
Stroud, Christian
Swayze, Isaac
Teetzel, John
Underwood, William ...
Vannatta, Benjamin ...
...
Vanevery, William
Vankoughnet, John
Walker, Peter
Warren, John
Westover, William
Will, Philip
Wilson, Gilman
•,••
Wright, John ...

•••

Ameliasburgh,
York,
•••
Flamboro' East,
Port Talbot, ...
Woodhouse,
...
Bertie,•
•••
Gosfield,
...
River St. Clair,
Sandwich, ...
Barton,
Belleville,
'..
York,
York,
...
Haldimand, ...
River Canard,
•••
Niagara,
...
•••
Burford,
...
Maidstone, ...
•••
Grantham, ...
Brockville, ...
Haldimand, ...
Ancaster,
...
Moravian Town,
River Thames,
•••
...
Niagara,
Barton,
St. Davids, ..
'Barton,
...
Niagara,
...
Amherstburgh,
•••
Sandwich, ...
Oxford, L. D.
Port Talbot, ...
Malden,
...
Amherstburgh,
River Thames,
Baldoon,
...
River Thames,
York,
...
River Thames,
...
Nelson,
Baldoon,
An caster,
York,
...
•••
York,
•••
•••
Stamford,
River Canard,
St. Davids, ...
Amherstburgh,
...
Glanford,
Saltfleet,
...
Cornwall,
Augusta,
... D. Niagara,
...
Grimsby,
...
Oxford, L. D.
Grantham, ...
Flamboro' West,
...
Cornwall,
...
Woodhouse, ...
...
...
... D. Bertie,
Grantham, ...
...
..•
Beverley,
...
Dunwich,
Oxford, L. D.
•••
.

•••

•••

•••

•••
•.•
•••
•.-4.
••.
••• .., ,
...
,

•• •
_4 , ,
,.,
.. .4
• • •

•• t
.•

•••
•••
••.
.•.

64:

•••

•••

•••

..,

..1 ,
••
.. ., ,
•••
•• •.
••...
•••
... , t.,
•••
...
•••
•..
•••
•
.,••
...

•..
•••
•••
••• •
.....,
•••

0
5
1p ;,
12
2
3
0
3
0
15
11
3
0
18
2
46
12
75
0
9
5
5.
19
12
10
23
0
5
12
10
150
0
18
6
0
10
7
2
0
24
0
4
21
10
0
4
37
18
5
10
1
17
5
17
0
34
0
15
5
20
0
100
10
17
15
4
15
41
6
23
10
2
15
16
12
12
0
20
0
15
0
122
5
3
15
9
0
150
0
13
4
10
,
0
5
12
49
6
128
5
12
0
25
4
6
12
10
,
322
0
3
22
5
.52
Q,
1
'6

Carried over,

632311

tg
40,
10

y

12
506
6
!..3•' '
5
—.',
117 • '
18
.
--.....

d.
0
0

0

0
0
0

4
1
5
14
23
2
1
3
7
1
3
47
2
3

6
0
0

0

0o0

0

0
0

0
6

0
0
0

0

9

0

6
0
0
0
0

0

o
o

0
6
o
o
6
0

0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

6

0
6

0

6
0

6
00

0
0

6
0
0
00

0

2440' 16

.0
o

PER CENT.

d.

.

1
3

6

0

10

0

34

0

8
2
91
0
0
5
1
14 0
12
1/

11
19
19
19
15

17
13
19
8
11
19
10
3
3
15

1 2

gii it

0
'8
2
10
8
2
0

8/

4
0/0
0
P
7
5
4
1
16 2
6
4
1
31
12 , „Q
10
1
11 10/
0
9 3
5
4
15
10
4 15 0
8 3
6
31
13
4
10 10
5
1
10
1
5
4
13
8
7
7
0 -. 45 i 10
1
6
5
19 11i
3
8
6 . 6

4
86'

4 0

8
7
0
1
9
1
3
0
10
47
4
.2
4
6
8
1
8
11
1
3.
14
15
40 12 61 it
7.
15
1
4
7
18
24
5 aqi
19
1
2
3
19
Ai, 8/
102
0 1f
" 11'
7
6
16 12
0
18
1
8 ft
14
1
2
19
3
7 10
160
2
1
2
1 .1-8
1.
1, 10.
37
12
5 ,1 37
•••■••••••

782

8

••

8 V ictorice.

A. 1844--5.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

Appendix

Appendix

LIST of War Loss Claims, &c.—( Continued.)

( G.G.G.)

(G. G. G.)

22d March.

22d March.
" NAME.

PER CENT.
•
••

Brought over, ...

782 1 • 8

2470

16

3

20
30
13
6

10
13
4
Q

0
6
0
0

51

FIRST SUPPLEMENTARY RETURN.
Doan, Israel, estate of ...
Fowler, Nathan
Maisonville, Alexis
Pitts, James ..

Louth,
...
...
Ancaster, now Sandwich,
Amherstburg,
...
Osnabruck, ...
•••
;,,,,a

•• •

SECOND SUPPLEMENTARY RETURN.
Brink, Nicholas
Brown, Henry
Chase, Mark
Edwards, Isaac
Kitchen, Henry
Pearson, Andrew
Pannier, Jean Bte.

•• •

9 10
14 31 12
3 7 -t o
18 0

•
i

Oxford, L. D.
York,
...
Port Talbot, ...
Oxford, L. D.
Niagara,
...
...
Barton,
Sandwich, ...

•• •

6
9
'4
1

15 . 0

W:r
.

37
13
8
4
5

.41
1

I,

:1:7;
.41; :

.0'
... 7
,0
,0
0

4
13 9
11
14 4
4
1,4 81
2
10 8
1
5 4
1 , 11 9
2
12

0
0
6
0
.0
. 0
0

THIRD SUPPLEMENTARY.
Huntly, Enoch

Port Talbot, ...

•• •

5

'19' 4 ft

2
8
100
3
1
1
5
2

7 6
1 9( *S
7 8 i- VS
19 2
11 8
8 Ill a
4 26 so
la
.7

FOURTH SUPPLEMENTARY.
...
Acker, Cornelius
Blane, James,
...
...
Cummings, Thomas, estate of
...
...
Camp, Isaac
Moor, Rachel
M'Bean, Gillis
Suchet, Manuel
...
Slater, Benjamin

Thorold,
:.
Mersea,
...
Chippawa, ...
Nelson,
'. ..
...
Pelham,
..;'I..: —
Cornwall
...
River Thames, W. D. '
Charlotteville,
...e%
.41.1 .
'• i.,
,

FIFTH SUPPLEMENTARY.

7
10
1r
25
317
•0
12•10
,
5
.0
4 .11
16 . 9
/7
.10

0
0
2
0
0
6
0
0

4

;Ilk,

1'
Holmes, William
Meyers, Peter,
M'Cuaig, Eve
Petty, Charles

Niagara,
...
Charlottenburgh,
Ancaster ,
Delaware,
...

...

•••

SIXTH SUPPLEMENTARY.

' 150
••4
•,.... . :. 8
...
15
.;. ,
14
1, I
I 1,
{I, t•

M'Dougall, Angus

...

Sr

Charlottenburgh,
Total,

,;,, r.
.
„o4

0
0
6

15

0

0

3250

2

5

,

Amount unpaid, One thousand and twentylnine pounds four shillings and one penny and

10 0
'. 13 10
15 0
14 2i

47
2
4
4

• 0

10
0
17

,

4

1029'

t .

15. 0
4 1 tik

n of a farthing, Currency.
W. MORRIS,

R. G,
RECEIVER GENERAL'S OFFICE,

18th February, 1845.

Letter from the Civil Secretary to the Provincial
Secretary.
CIVIL SECRETARY'S OFFICE,

•

Indian Department,

"of such payment," I am directed by the Governor
General to inform you that this Department is not in
possession of any information on the subject, but that
an application will be made to the Chief Superintendent
Of Indian Affairs, who, it is possible, may be able to
furnish some.

20th February, 1845.
SIR,.._. With reference to that part of the Address of
the House of Assembly requiring " the names of the
" Indians entitled to such remuneration, whether - it
" has been paid them, and if so, by whom and when ;
"and also a detailed statement of the kind of evidence

have the honor to be, Sir,
Your obedient servant,
J. M. HIGGINSON,

Civil Secretary.
The Honble. D.

DALY,

Provincial Secretary.

•
▪

-

A. 1844-5.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

8 Vietoriw.

Appendix

Appendix

(G. G. G.) Letter from the Chief Superintendent of Indian 1 losses sustained during the late war with the United (G. G. G.)
Affairs to the Civil Secretary, with twelve Enclo- States, viz :
sures.
22d March.
2 2d March.
.
£227 19 6
Moray ians,
78 3 8
Ottawas and Chippawas, .
I
( Copy.)
.
Shawanees,
Hurons, .
Senecas and Cay ugas,

INDIAN OFFICE,

Toronto, 13th March, 1845.

20 7 3
328 12 3 12
9 14 94

•

SIR,—I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt
of your letter of the 21st ultimo, requesting me to I also enclose five Pay Lists which you will be
transtnit to your Department any information in refer- pleased to have acquitted with the least possible delay,
ence to the payment of the Indians for War Losses, and returned to me.
that may be in my possession, and enclos ng a copy of
your letter to the Provincial Secretary, embodying the I have the honor, &c.,
substance of an Address of the I louse of Assembly to
SAML. P. JARVIS,
(Signed,)
His Excellency the Governor General on the subject.
Ch. S. L Affairs.
In reply, I have to observe that shortly after my
appointment to the office of Chief Superintendent, I
was directed by the Lieutenant Governor to remit to
Mr. Superintendent Ironside, the sum of £664 17s. 6d.
and to Major Winniett the sum of £918 9s. 2d., making in all £1583 6s. 8d., being the third, and, I
believe, the last instalment due for War Losses to the
The list of
Indians under their superintendence.
vouchers I placed on the files of this office on that
occasion
herewith transmit. The previous payments of the Indians were made by my predecessor,
and as I do not find any vouchers for them in the
office, I infer that they were at the time transmitted
either to His Excellency the Lieutenant Governor,
the Inspector General, or the Council Office.

Letter from the Chief Superintendent of Indian
.Affairs to .Major Winniett.
(Copy.)

Sin,—I have the honor to enclose herewith, by
this day's mail, Pay Lists numbering from one to nine
inclusive, of the third instalment of War Losses due
to the Six Nations Indians residing on the Grand
River.

In the vouchers for payments of the third instalment
to the Six Nation Indians, the name of each individual who suffered loss is stated, and I presume the previous payments were made to the same individuals.

I also transmit a *draft on the Gore Bank for the
sum of Nine hundred and eighteen pounds nine shillings and two pence, currency, to enable you to pay
the claimants the sums respectively due to them.

I have the honor, &c.

(Signed,)

INDIAN OFFICE,

Toronto, 9th November, 1837.

You will be pleased to have the Pay Lists acquitted
with the least possible delay, and returned to me.

SAML. P. JARVIS,

Ch. S. I. Affairs.

No. 1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,

J. M. HIGGINsoN, Esquire,
&c. &c. &c.

Letter from the Chief Superintendent of Indian
Affairs to Mr. Superintendent Ironside.

St. Regis,
Mohawks, .
Tuscaroras, .
Aughquagas, .
Tutulies,
.
Delawares, .
Onondagas, .
.
Cayugas,
Senecas,

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

£11 13 4
224 1 4
41 2 7+
78 15 8i
12 12 101,
161 8 8+
107 6 81
254 19 3+
26 8 51

I have the honor, &c.,

(Copy.)

(Signed,)

INDIAN OFFICE,

SAML. P. JARVIS,

Ch. S. I. Affairs.

Toronto, 9th November, 1837.

Major WINNIETT,

SIR,-1 have the honor to enclose to you a draft on
the Honble. J. Gordon for the sum of £664 17s. 6d.
enrrency, to enable you to pay the undermentioned
Tribes of Indians the sums respectively due them for

B

*Check drawn by Thos. G. Ridout, Cashier Bank U. C., on A.
Stevens, Esquire, Cashier, Gore Bank, Hamilton, dated 8th Novr.,
1837, No. 5508, for £918 95. 2d. currency.

8 Victoriw.

A. 1844-5.

)

Appendix (G.

Appendix

Appendix

No. 1.—ST. REGIS.

( G. G. G.)

( G. G. G.;

—Th

22cl March.

PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ; 22,1 march.
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum (X5,000) awarded
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of £1,583 6s. £3d. is
now payable.

8
c..,0

Individual
Tribe.

Amount.

Names of Claimants.

Third Payment.

7
8
9
80

St. Regis,

S.

.d.

1 Kaerishon(next of kin of Akal) 3
2 Gonwaheaghtaghneugh, ... 2
3 Big Wood's wife, ...
4 Lookabout,

17
14
12
9

1

£ 11

13

4

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

J. Martin.
0 Gowahentakwen, her + mark.
Lookabout, his + mark.
8 Lookabout, his + mark.

Amounting to Eleven pounds thirteen shillings and fourpence three farthings, Halifax Currency, Dollars at Ss. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
JAS. WINNIETT,

S. I, A.

Witnesses to the above payments :
WILLIAM MUIRHEAD,
JACOB MARTIN.

No. 2.—MOHAWKS.
PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awarded
by the Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the Reign of
His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of X1,583 Gs. 8d. is now
payable.

8

Individual
Tribe.

Names of Claimants.

0

Third Payment.

• Z

80
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
90
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Amount.

Mohawk.
CC
CC
44

ar
CC
CC

'C
CC
44

4C
Cc

CC
CC
CC

X

s.

... 18
1 David Davids,
... 2
...
2 Jacob Brant,
., 0
...
3 Henry Pawlis,
4 Henry Dehowennagrionh, ... 3
.. 17
...
5 Widow Hill, .
.. 3
...
6 Betsy Duncan,
... 3
...
7 Widow Pawlis,
8 Pawlis Onwanegharaugh, ... 6
••• 1
9 Dekanawaghtegueb,
... 1
...
10 Asgwentsigoh,
... 2
...
...
11 Sarvatis,
12 Elizabeth, Joel Smith's sister, 3
13 Warig DeKalarogeugtha, ... 1
... 3
...
14 Henry Liekers,
... i ... 3
15 Deyononnathe,
16 Susannah, Oneida Joseph's
daughter,
...
... 2
17 Margaret Oneida, ...
... 0
2
18 Hester, third daughter,
... 2
19 Widow Warig Carey,

12

£1 68

10

Carried forward,

0

1
6
3
3

0

15
11
2
14
0

6

1

6
14

0

15

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

it'ai-rft) Aka
I Laurence Davis, his + mark.
11 Jacob Brant, his + mark.
2 David Hill, his + mark.
31 Deborah Hill, her + mark.
111 Deborah Hill, her + mark.
3 Jacob Martin.
3 Mary Johnson, her + mark.
10/ Paul Pawlis, his + mark.
41 Catherine Winney, her + mark.
7i Sarah Davids, her --I- mark.
si Lawrence Baptiste, his + mark.
5 J. Martin.
5/ Mary Green, her + mark.
111 Nancy Green, her + mark.
41 Hannah Heron, her + mark.
6 Oneida Joseph, his + mark.
10Q Oneida Joseph, his mark.
11 -1 Lawrence Davis, his X mark.
6 Henry Brant.
.

71

4

8 Vietoriw.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

A. 1844-5.
Appendix

Appendix

PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants, &c.—( Continued.)

(G. G. G.)
•

22d March.

ea
C.)

A,

22d March.

Individual
Tribe.

;''' Names of Claimants.

Amount.

I

Third Payment.

Z1

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the'Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

S.

Brought forward,
Mohawk.
200
2
3
6
6
7
8
9
210
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
220
1

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
230
2
3
4
6

cc

cc
cc
cc
''
C'
''
'C
'C

''
CC
'C

'C

'C
C'

'C
4C
''

CC
CG
cc
CC
CC
''
CC
CC
44

7
8
9
40

CC
CC
iC
''

2
3
4
5
6

7
8
9
50
1

2
3
4
5
6

7

8

‘C
'C

CC

CC

C:
CC
'C
''
''
''

I.

10

71

6
61 Christian Lewis, her + mark.
•-•-:, 2
6
2
6/J. Martin.
'..:. 8 15
9 Catharine Hill, her -I-- mark.
0 14 102 Oneida Joseph, his + mark.
0
... 1
5/J. Martin.
••• 1 17
22 Hannah Claus, her + mark.
1
4/Magdalen Carpenter, her + mark.
•••• 3
8
.... 2
mark.
42 George Martin, his
7
••• 0
5/J. Martin.
2 Jacob Johnson, his -I- mark.
••. 8 11
3
•„,.. - 3
3 J. Martin.
21 Hester Hill, his + mark.
..i 1 '43 10
3 Sarah Hill, her -I- mark.
... '- 2 10
-:
33 Margaret Hurst,
...
... 0 14. 10/ Oneida Joseph, his + mark.
34 English Joe's wife, Hester
0
English,
mark.
11 Lawrence Davis, his
...
... 2
35 Tekarihoga,
...
... 213 49 ..11111annah Newhouse, her + mark.
4/John Hill, his + mark.
- l3
36 John Hill, senior, ...
37 Widow Elizabeth, ...
9/J. Martin.
••. , 1
9
... - 0 - 14 10g. Samuel Coffee, his -I- mark.
38 Widow Hannah Coffee,
39 Nikawegneuta,
... '0 '13
..
0- Lawrence Thomas, his + mark.
... , 2
6 6 Henry Brant.
40Catharine Nasey Brant,
32 Esther Froman, her -I- mark.
41 Young Troublesome Jacob, 0
-9
...
... '3
1
4/J. Martin.
42 Widow Filler,
O 1 1 1 Margaret Hess, her -I- mark.
2
43 Widow Kanaroghkta,
ii•
..'. 3
1
11J. Martin.
...
44 Little Peter,
...
1 3 J Martin.
3 18
45 John Green,
mark.
5
32 Elizabeth Lottridge, her
2
4e Samuel Lottridge, ...
5
52 Esther Martin, her -I- mark.
47 Widow Deyoreayon,
O
6 John Froman, his -I- mark.
...
48 John Vrooman,
"t4t 2 15
...
49 John Davids,
14,
42 Lawrence Davis, his + mark.
At
50 Daniel, (a war chief,
6-1, Daniel Spinger, his + mark.
4 Lawrence Davids, his -I- mark,
51 Lawrence Davids, ...
'2
•.• 1
...
7
9 Isaac Lewis, his + mark.
52 Eve Lewis,
mark.
4/Aaron Fraser, his
53 Widow Hester Hill,
1
3
2
...
.•• 1
4 . J. Martin.
54 Peter Major,
.. 1 17
2/Isaac Locke, his + mark.
55 Jaoah sareth a,
•.•
0 18
7 Elizabeth Ball, her + mark.
56 Jammima,
... 2 12
1 Catharine Hill, her --I- mark.
...
57 Isaac Hill,
58 Widow Hester Troublesome t Q. 14 102 Esther Martin, her -I- mark.
:: ' 0' 14 102 Mary Maracle, her + mark.
59 Lawrence Green, ... '
..
'...i. Y:1!
9 9/John George, his + mark.
60 Dewasengh tha,
... ', 1.
4 Isaac Lewis, his -I- mark.
61 Jacob Lewis, ` ...
2
62 Mrs. Brant, (Bay of Quinte,) 6'
8
4/J. Martin.
••• 2 12
•••
1 Esther Hill, her --I- mark.
63 Jacob Hill,
mark.
...
.17
22 Joseph Martin, his
64 Joseph Martin,
„-•-••
•••
6/ Mary Johnson, her -I- mark.
...
65 Otariohogh,
6
66 Dione Prince's daughter, .... 0
7/J. Martin.
5
mark,
67 Jacob Deharonawaryks, ... 0 14 10// .Jacob Johnson, junior, his
... 5 15
4/ J. Martin.
68 Peggy Symington,
... 1
9 J. Martin.
69 Mary Symington,
7
•,.... 2
70 William Johnson,
7-1 William Johnson, his X mark.
••• 0 14 102 Susannah Davids, her ± mark.
...
71 Richard Davids,
9/ Deborah Hill, her + mark.
2
72 Henry Tewhannas,
2
- „ 10
...
O 11 J. Martin.
73 Peter Pawlis,
mark.
3 John Green, his
••• 3
74 Jemima, Brant,
3
20 Guistin Joanghuance,
21 DeKaneatarighgwar,
...
22 George Hill,
23 Keheroriorketreen, ...
..
24 Isaac Bamberry,
25 Thomas Sulkey,
26 Henry Hill,
...
27 George Martin,
...
28 John Deyoneghguen,
29Jacob Johnson,
...
,..
30 Joel Smith,
...
31John Hill,
32 Seth Hill,

,

iC
AC
t4

75 Prince Van Vater, ...
...
76 Seth Hills,
•,•
77 ppisla Joseph,

41 "

I

•••
•••
224

111

G. G. G.)

Van Patter, his + mark.
J. Martin.
10:/ Oneida Joseph, his + mark,
7 22

1I4

•

Amounting to the sum of Two hundred and twenty-four pounds one shilling and fourpence, Halifax Currency,/
Dollars at 5s. each,
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
JAS. WINNJETT,
Witnesses to the foregoing payments :—WILLIAM MuntHEAn,
S. I. A.
JACOB MARTIN.

A ppendix (G. G. G.)
Appendix

22d March.

Appendix

No. 3.—TUSCARORAS.

:G. G. G.)
—A—,

A. 1844-5.
( G. G. G.)

PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian
Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
•
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awarded
by the Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the Reign
of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of £1,583 6s. 8d. is now
payable.
Individual

*;1
C.)

Names of Claimants.

Tribe.
Alp

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
Third Payment. having signed duplicate receipts.
Amount.

,;4 C,V.•Gt
,

.-.S!

d.

8.

y 1

9
60

Tuscaroras.
44

1

CC

2
3
4
5
266

GC

7

lC

8
9
70

1

2
3
4
5
6
7

CC
4C
44
GC

CC
CC

cc
CG

C'
CC
CC
CC

'C

CC

... 0 17
...
1 Powder Face,
2 Susannah Bill, Jack's sister, 0 19
9
... 3
3 Widow Catharine,
6
2
4 Aaron Tuscarora,
4
. ••,. .- 1
5 William Tuscarora,
.. • .; 0 19
...
6 Kawenneyesha,
2
'. 2
7 Thomas Tuscarora,
... 0 15
8 Paulus Tuscarora,
P.-.. t3 19
Waharanghyakelsgo,
10 Black Chief,
...
•!; 5 11
;..., , 1 18
...
11 Awaneyeseugh,
1..., D' 11
12 Warigh Tuscarora,
. ••„ i' 3 17
...
13 White Coat,
! ..+ t.' 0 15
14 Bublick,
...
8
Fl.. : .7
15 Bill Jack's family, ...
18
••G ': 11
16 Kayeughneghson, ...
...
, .., . 0 15
17 Kawaynageare,
••, . ,..0 15
...
18. Oja,
o 17
19 Kaneughriahawi,
£ 41

41 Elizabeth Johnson. her -I- mark.
3i George Mountpleasant, his mark.
41John Whitecoat, his
mark.
31 Aaron Nash.
11- Elizabeth Cusack, her + mark.
31 John Thomas, his + mark.
5i John Thomas, his
mark.
5/Elizabeth Cusack, her ± mark.
1
1 /Elizabeth
Cusack, her ± mark.
10 Sally Grote, her -I-- mark.
6/ Sage Harris, his + mark.
6( Elizabeth Jack, her + mark.
2 1 Jahn Whitecoat, his + mark.
5/ Sage Harris, his + mark.
61Sage Harris, his + mark.
st Sarah Longfish, her mark.
5/ Susannah Jack, her + mark.
5/Jacob Oja, his + mark.
4/ Mary Anderson, her -I- mark,

2

Amounting to Forty-one pounds two shillings and seven pence half-penny, Halifax Currency, Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
Witnesses to the foregoing payments,—WILLIAM MIIIRHEAD,

JAS. WINNIETT,

S. I. A.

JACOB MARTIN.

No. 4.—AUGHQUAGAS.
PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awarded
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of X 1,583 6s. 8d.
is now payable.
8
C.)

0

Individual
Tribe.

Names of Claimants.

Amount.
Third PayMent.

X

8.

8 Aughquagas.
CG
9
CC
80
9

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

1 Sarragonah,
2 Widow Doratin,
3 Widow Cobus,
4 Jacob Scharmhorn,
5 Peter Green,
6 Kakshagh,
7 Delaware Aaron, ...
8 Peter Smith,
9 Peter the Runner, ...
10 Lawrence, Aaron's son,
11 Dehaweyagea,
12 Wareyabgonagh,
Carried forward,

5
1
8
3

0

2

0

3
3
3
2
£ 32

2
18
,3
17
13
15
0

13
3
15
9
0

13

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

d.
J. Martin.
7 Isaac Bucasing, his
mark.
8 J. Martin.
J. Martin.
21 Peter Green, his + mark.
5/ J. Martin.
Peter Green, his + mark.
6 Eve Hill, her + mark.
Susannah Green, her + mark.
3 Susannah Green, her + mark.
5 Peter Green, his + mark.
61 Catherine Dickson, her + mark.
10

22d March.

▪ G. G.)
Appendix (G.

8 Victorioe.

Appendix

ppendix

PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants, &c.—( Continued.)

G. G.)
!4:1 March.

A. 1844-5.

g
0

22d March.

Individual
Tribe.

Amount.

Names of Claimants.

Third Payment.

z

s.

Brought forward,
90 Aughquagas.
91
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
300
1
2
-3
4
5
44
CC

4C

4i

''
CC

CC

it

13 Aughquaga Joseph,
14 Joseph Frin,
15 Thenegtha,
16 Kaneyengotaugh,
17 Wari Schoharie,
18 Elizabeth Schoharie,
19 Gitiyea,
•••
••.
20 Nicholas,
•••
21 Water Snake,
22 Widow Kaynayegh,
23 Nicholas Gideon, ...
24 Kaneghsonnengtha,
25 Widow Steynnoon,
26 Hananayentou,
27 Shaghsennatigh,
28 Tagwaraghseutha,

6

0
0
•• •

2

•• •

0
0

8
6
2
0
•• •

•••
•• •

•• •

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

d.

13 10

32

8
1
3

0
0

3

31 Isaac Aughquaga, his + mark.
9
si Adam Frin, his + mark.
19
31 J. Martin.
10
1+ Jacob Isaac, hig -± mark.
5 9+ Lewis Snow, his + mark.
11
7 Lewis Snow, his ± mark.
11 71Mary Nicholas, her + mark.
9
2 1 Moses Walker, his + mark.
O
6 Elizabeth Johnson, her ± mark.
15
51 Joseph Otter, his + mark.
Oi Mary Nicholas, her ± mark.
O
3
2 Elizabeth Johnson, her + mark.
13 31 Magdalen Mary, her + mark.
11
7 Jacob Isaac, his + mark.
11 7 Mary Crawford, her + mark.
1
8 Catherine Dickson, her + mark.

-7

8
78 15
Amounting to the sum of Seventy-eight pounds fifteen shillings and eight pence half-penny, Halifax Currency,
Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
JAS. WINNIETT,
S. I. A.

Witnesses to the foregoing payments :WILLIAM MUIRHEAD,
JACOB MARTIN.

No. 5.—UPPER AND LOWER TUTULIES.
PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awar'ded
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of .E1,583 Gs. 8d.
is now payable.
Individual
Tribe.

Names of Claimants.

Amount.
Third Payment.

Iv

6 Upper Tutulies.
7
8
9
10
CC

1 Lower Tutulies.
2
3
'C
4
5

i+i44

1 Charles Tutulie,
2 Nicrouhagh,
3 Yoehahowan e ugh, ...
4 Yeneughwaghtowaneugh,
5 John Tutulie,
•••
•,•

...
1 Molly,
2 Sleepy Davy,
3 Black Face,
4 Molly's Grandson, ...
5 Curley headed George's sonin-law, ...

s.

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

d.

+ i., fat
'

1
3
0 17
3
3 9
0 8

1 3 Nigouhah, his -I- mark.
4+ Nigouhah, his + mark.
11 J. Martin.
51 Christy Ann, her + mark.
8 John Tutulie, his + mark.

7

1

9 14

0

16
17
3
7

2
1
0

6
5 11

2+ Molly, her + mark.
10/ Sleepy Davy, his + mark.
11 Black Face, her + mark.
81 J. Martin.
2 J. Martin.
1

Total,
12 12 101,
Amounting to Twelve pounds twelve shillings and ten pence half-penny, Halifax Currency, Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

_ Witnesses to the above payments :—
WILLIAM MUIRHEAD,
JACOB MARTIN.

(G.G.G.)

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
JAS. WINNIETT,
S. I. A.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

8 Victoria.
p
d
Apenix

9

w

Appendix

No. 6.—DELAWARE.

( G. G. G.)

PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of X5000 awarded
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of £1,583 6s. 8d.
is now payable.

22dMarch.

( G. G. G. )
2 d March

A. 1844-5.

Individual
Tribe.

0

Amount.

Names of Claimants.

zci

Third Payment.
8.

d.

1
1 Petop, (Village Chief,)
2 Kill Snake,
...
.
7
3 Abraham Young,
1
.•
4 Adam
2
10
5' Cornelius, (one fish,)
...
6John Montour,
.
6
2
7IJoseph Chew,
1
8 Poney,
•••
•••
•••
9 Thorn Snake,
... 5
•••
...
... 5
10 John Wampum,
11 Shoemaker Snake, ...
4
...
...
... 8
12 Dick,
13 Widow of Captain Simmey, 1
14 Delaware Jim's Aunt,
6
...
2
15 Delaware Jim,
...
4
16 John Hottenbar,
17 John Delaware,
...
2
18 Left hand Isaac,
0
2
19 Joe Jackson,
••• 9
20 Abraham Huff,
1
21 Delaware Peggy,
22 Moses Wife,
.,.., 8
••• 3
23 Old Moses,
24 Joseph Montour,
14
...
25 Delaware Toad,
6
26 John Trinis ,
9
•
...
0
27 Capt. Soap,
...
2
28 Joe Dick,
29 Capt. Thom, (War Chief,) ... 12
...
0
30 Hank Young,
... 4
...
31 Jabob Vandal,
32 Jacob, son to the Commissary, 6
... 4
33 John Curley,
...
...
2
34 Thomas,

8
6
14
14
4
16
6
18
15
15
16
0
4
9
6
6
17
4
17
12
10

111 Catharine Moses, her + mark.

£ 161

8

£
6
7
8
9
20

1

2
3
4
5
6
7

Delawares.

Lf
44
''
Li
CC
44
4C

.

8

9
30

CC
44
CL

1

IL

3
4

LL

6
7

LL

LL

44
LL

if
CC

9
90

CC

GC

1

iC

3
4
5
6

C:

7

''

8
9

CC

LL

CC
CC
CC

CC

Received of 3 amuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

7

9
8
19
12
2
6
10
4
6
5
6
17

7/ John Wampum, his mark.
9 Samuel Chew, his + mark.
2/J. Martin.
6 Mrs. Moses, her + mark.
111 Mrs. Moses, her + mark.
3i John Moses, his 4. mark.
7/ Mrs. Moses, her + mark.
9 Joseph Snake, his
mark.
9 John Wampum, his + mark.
5/J. Martin.
0 Hannah Dockstetter, her + mark.
I/ J. Martin.
3 J. Martin.
3%J. Martin.
9/ Jim Hottenbar, his mark.
10Q John Huff, his
mark.
9/ Kenteahoh, her + mark.
9% J. Martin.
11/John Huff; his —I-- mark.
101 Catherine Moses her
mark.
61 Catherine Moses, her + mark.
4/ John Moses, his + mark.
10 Betsey Huff, her + mark.
1/J. Martin.
10$ John Moses, his
mark.
11/Patrick Lathom, his —I-- mark.
4 Hannah Dockstetter, her + mark.
fq William Thom, his + mark.
9(John Hank, his
mark.
KJ. Martin.
5 W. Jacob, his + mark.
9/ P. Lathom, his + mark.
9(Joe Snake, his ± mark.
,

8%

Amounting to the sum of One hundred and sixty-one pounds eight shillings and eight pence three farthings,
Halifax Currency, Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
JAS. WINNIETT,

S. I. A.
Witnesses to the foregoing payments :WILLIAM MUIRHEAD,

J ACOB MARTIN.

etioktial
oat.■14.-.V4'

8 Victorioe.

A. 1844-5.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

Appendix

Appendix

( G. G. G.)
22d March.

No. 7.—ONONDAGAS.
PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awarded
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, the sum of £1,583 6s. 8d., part
thereof being now payable.
Individual
0

Tribe.

Amount.

Names of Claimants.

ThirdPayment
X
50
1
2
3
4
5
356
8
9
60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
70

1

2
3
4
5
7
6

Onondagas.
44
CC

CC
CC
CC

44
C4
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC

CC,
CC
CC

CC
CC

CC
CC
CC
CC

CC

... 3
...
1 Seed Corn,
••,
••• 6
2 Echo,
...
••• 10
3 Sir John's Chief,
4 Shaoghurrajowance,
... 6
5 John Bearfoot or family, and
his relations,
...
.. 18
6 Kanahactahesa,
...
... 3
7 Kanowrarou,
...
...
8 Withalotorho (2d Clear Sky,)
... 5
9 Widow Clear Sky's,
1
...
10 Wahotsighgnahon, ...
11 Athaghserarea,
...
••. 6
12 Osahetagearat,
.•. ).
13 Katsitaks,
,,4 0
14 Kayentagonagh,
.., 4
...
4,
15 Sera woagh,
...
...
16 Shagoghseawgeghte, ...
••.
4
17 Onakarontough,
... 3
18 Kanatagheiron,
19 Otisnoughyata,
2
20 Karaghguagh,
1
21 Soghueakuese,
•••
•.. 4
1
22 Rayatawentogogoh, ...
•••
23 Dehowenagriough, ...
... 3
24 Peggy Crawford,
..
... 1
25 William Crawford, ...
26 Kanouraron,
...
•••
27 Shadekarias,
.., 7

..•

0

1
1

s.

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

d.

41 Catherine, her ± mark.
9
3 ' 6 John Echo, his + mark.
16 ' 1 Thomas Hill, his 1-- mark.
3 6 Kaneayowiseh, his ± mark.
•7

3/Joseph Bearfoot, his + mark.
7/ Kanaserone, her + mark.
3 Baptiste, his + mark.
0 J. Martin.
2Q Mary Bearfoot, her -I- mark.
6/ Catherine, her + mark.
1 William, Ins + mark.
0/Tanehtoah, her + mark.
8 Sarah Thomas, her + mark.
10/Peter, his 4- mark.
6 Kahonyoutye, her + mark.
91J. Martin.
4/John Buck, his + mark.
Kanatarirhon, her + mark.
3/John, his + mark.
1 Aswahtha, his ± mark.
7tTehonenaes, his + mark.
0+Jacob, his ± mark.
9 John Buck, his + mark.
6+ Mary Sky, her + mark.
5/ Mary Sky, her + mark.
5/Thomas Hill, his + mark.
10/ Mary, her ± mark.

14
3
4
14
4
18
11
5
7
4
13
5
18
7
6
3
10
5

1

16
18
18
0

£ 107
6
8i
Amounting to One hundred and seven pounds six shillings and eight pence half-penny, Halifax Currency, Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
Witnesses to the foregoing payments,—WILLIAM MUIRHEAD,
JACOB MARTIN.

JAS. WINNIETT,

S. I. A.

No. 8.—UPPER AND LOWER CAYUGAS.
PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awarded
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of £1,583 6s. 8d.
is now payable.
ce
E3
c-

Individual
Tribe. Names of Claimants. Amount.
Third Payment.

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

s. l d.
3 Upper Cayugas. 1 Hen Hawk's son, ...
6
2
CC
4
2 James Cayuga,
...
... 1 18
3 Aaron Cayuga,
...
6
‘1!.• 2
CC
6
4 Gonnaweahtanigh Cayuga, ... 3 13
Ci
117
5 Atawakon Cayuga, ...
... 3
3
CC
8
6 Kayaenghue,
7
••.,.,, 4
•••
9
7 Peter Green's wife, ...
•••• 0 15
C'
20
8 Takaghuyotontye, ...
... 4 13

Carried over, ...

£ 20

4 Hen Hawk's son, his + mark.
3/-Joseph, his + mark.
4 Joseph Dockstater, his ± mark.
4 J. Martin.
7i Kagariraes, her ± mark.
7 Christiana, her + mark.
5 Mary Green, her + mark.
7 Joseph Dockstater, his ± mark

3 11

( G. G. G. )
22d March.

8 Victories.
Appendix •

Appendix

PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants, &c.—( Continued.)

(G. G. G.)
22d March.

A. 1844-5.

Appendix (G. G. G.)

d

22d March.

Individual

as
C.)

Tribe.

Amount.

Names of Claimants.

(G. G. G.)

Third Payment.

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

•

d.
•..--

Brought over,

20

3

11

1
2
2
2
3
6
9
4
4
1

7

0 J. Martin.
41J. Martin.
al Joseph, his + mark.
10 Elizabeth Crawford, her
mark.
6 J. Martin.
6 Mrs. Whinney, her + mark.
91 Mrs. Whinney, her + mark.
61 Cayuga George, his + mark.
9 Fish Carrier, his + mark.
10 J. Martin.
2/ J. Martin.
ot J. Martin.
1 J. Jacob, his + mark.
8 Joseph, his ± mark.
3/ General, his + mark.
6 John, his + mark.
6 Kanatwakhon, her + mark.
2 1 Esther Doctor, her + mark.

Upper Cayugas. 9 Showeghsowane,
CC
10 Elizabeth,
•••
.••
CC
11 Ogsurakaro,
...
...
CC
12 Adam and his wife, ... .;)...
if
13 Shagawike,
...
..
14 Mrs. Whinney,
...
...
CC
15 John Camp, for the white man,
CC
16 Aaron's mother.
...
...
GC
17 Anatarigh, ...
•••
iG
18 Kayonwanew,
...
44
19 Widow Kaheryenengtha, ...
44
20 John Hill's wife,
...
. ...
21 Wahorionti,
...
...
CC
22 Oneida Jacob and his wife, ...
CC
23 Ouranayeghtani,
5
iC
24 Shanewhatigh,
•••
i ...
CC
25 Taraweghent,
•••
7
26 Karotshera,

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30
1
2

I
13
17
5
3
16
13
8
7

1

4
11
16

10

12
13
19

0
4
0

83
7
9 Lower Cayugas. 27 George Steeltrap,
;. .,. " 1 17
...
,c
, 3, 16
28 Waoghnegonti,
40
,,
5
29 Ka gliea gn a ghs,
•••
, •.. _ 2
1
G4
2
2
30 Kaneaninegtha,
2
if
9
31 Dekaghuanuatoghuegh,
! ... 3
4
CC
0
2
32 Dehagoghsagyk,
•••
5
CG
146
CG
... 4 15
33 Tayorheasere,
•••
7
,,
34 Thanatharea, (Capt. Hainer,) {4 14
8
2
35 Fish Carrier,
.6
9
14
36 Kawra nayentas,
•••
50
K1
2 16
37 Ateneanokla,
.:
38 Deyaughteghrogeugh, ,3 11
2
,,
39 Ka ghratoto u,
•••
... 8 11
3
2
4
40 Joseph Dockstader, ...
,I1 • •
4
,,
21 17
41 George Montour
5
LC
1
14
42 Widow Sally Montour,
•••
Ci
7
it
8
43 Cayuga George, Long House, 0
8
44
9
44 John Bill,
...
... 2,
9
45 Captain Hainer's mother and
6
... 8 —14
family,
CC
... 2 3
46Josanyatyagh,
1
8
...
47 Shanawati,
... 11 10
48 Cayuga John,
3
cc
... 4 10
49 Dick's wife,
4
CC
2 12
...
50 John Harris,
51 Young Fish Carrier, ...
, ... 5 15
if
0 13
...
.52 Cayuga William,
it
1
8
53 Little Woman, a widow,
8
9
CC
4
9
54 The Young Chief, ...
70
LC
.1 16
55 The Tall Slink,
...
CC
2
if
18
56 Akadsdaraks,
3
1
3
57 Atennightha,
143
it
4
58 Samuel Van Every, ...
174
5
CC
2 5
59 Shosanetis,
6
46
0 10
60 Hickory Bush,
7
41
4
8
61 John Jacob,
8
CC
9
13
62 Witchtua,
9
1

,

-

1

1

.

91
6 John Styers, his + mark.
11 Jemima, her + mark.
4 J. Martin.
9 J. Martin.
91 John Jacob, his + mark.
1/ Warner, his + mark.
mark.
11 Young Hainer, his
1/ Dekayouwakeh, his + mark.
4. Wahotarawakhaye, his + mark.
10 Kuneas, her ± mark.
9 James Covey, his + mark.
6t Atewearimas, her + mark.
Tall Slink, his + mark.
11/ Joseph Dockstader, his + mark.
mark.
43 Mrs. Montour, her
11/ Sally Montour, her mark.
9 John Styers, his + mark.

91 John Bill, his + mark.

9/ Mrs. Montour, her + mark.
8 J. Martin._
Skanawatih, his --1-- mark.
10 John Styers, his + mark.
8/ Joseph Snake, his + mark.
61 John Harris, his + mark.
71 Peter Fish Carrier, his mark.
11 J. Martin.
91 Little Woman, her mark.
1

N J. Martin.
81 Tall Slink, his ± mark.
51 Patrick Lathom, his + mark.
mark.
11 James Goose, his
mark.
5/ Tall Slink, his
mark.
5/ John Tom, his
71 Mrs. Montour, her + mark.
0 / John Jacob, his + mark.
91 John Styers, his + mark.
1

31
£ 254 19
Amounting to Two hundred and fifty-four pounds nineteen shillings and three pence three farthings, Halifax
Currency, Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
Witnesses to the foregoing payments :—WILLIAM

MUIRHEAD,

JACOB MARTIN.

JAS. WINNIETT,

S. I.

4.

8 Victoria.
A pp endi
( G.G.G.)
72d March.

A. 1844--5

Appendix (G. G. G.) (H. II.

Appendix

No. 9.—SENECAS.
( G. G. G.)
PAY LIST of the undermentioned Indian Claimants for Losses sustained during the late War ;
the respective amounts being calculated in a due proportion to the sum of £5000 awarded 22d March.
by the Board of Commissioners under the Provincial Act passed in the fourth year of the
Reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, of which the sum of £1,583 6s. 8d.
is now payable.

E

Individual
Amount.

Names of Claimants.

Tribe.

hird Payment.
d.

S

.

6

7
8
9
10
11
12

1 Kaghneghtageh,
2 Kaneyakarere,
3 Tehanyotahos,

4 16
3

CC

4 Kaneyegh,

if

5 Nekaroatsa,
6 Jamieson,
7 Sameiace,

3 17
6
1
1
8
6
.5

Senecas.
CC

if
it

Received of Samuel P. Jarvis, Senior Officer
of the Indian Department in Upper Canada,
the sums set opposite our respective names,
having signed duplicate receipts.

4/ William Dickson
-I- mark.
Sarah Thomas, her + mark.
7 Kanonkeritawih, his -- mark.
-2/ William Alvis.
5 3 Kanonkeritawih, his -1- mark.

0 11

11 Rachel Jamieson, her + mark.
41Kanonkeritawili, his + mark.

8
Amounting to the sum of Twenty-six pounds eight shillings and five pence three farthings, IIalifax Currency,

Dollars at 5s. each.
INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Brantford, 29th November, 1837.
Witnesses to the foregoing payments :—WILLIAM

JAS. WINNIETT,

MUIRHEAD,

S. I. A.

JACOB MARTIN.

(Copy.)
DISTRIBUTION of £664 17s. 6d., being the proportion of the third and last Instalment,
£ 1,583 Gs. 8d., due to the undermentioned Indian Tribes.
Amount of Claim.

TRIBE,

A sr d.
Moravians,
...
....
.Ottawas and Chippawas,
Shawnees,
...
...
...
...
H uron, Seneca and Cayuga, ...

•• •
•• •

•••

•••

•••

1182
0
0
408 0 0
97 15
0
0
1715 10
50 10 0

666
228
59
960
28

10
4
9

21 227 19 6
2
78 ,. 3
0
20 7 1:
51 328 12 3i
2/
9 14 91Z

X 345 3 151 0

1942

16

Di 664 :17

.

(Signed )

INDIAN DEPARTMENT,

Sum allowed. Sum now payable.
•
4:
d. • £

)

9

1

6/

GEO IRONSIDIty

Amherstburgh, 30th April, 1837.

S. I. A.

RETURN
Appendix To an Address from the Legislative Assembly, to His Excellency the Governor General,

(H.H.H.)
------,L._..A___Th
22d March.

bear-

-

-

-

Appendix

ing date the 10th ultimo, praying for a Return of the Tonnage and number of Ships and (H.I LH.)
other vessels owned
in this Province in the year 1844, distinguishing as nearly as may be, (-----1---,
_
those employed on the Lakes, those on the River St. Lawrence above Quebec, 22d March.
those in the Coasting Trade below Quebec and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and those in the
Trade beyond the Seas, as nearly as can be ascertained ; Steamers from vessels navigated
by sails; the ports or places in this Province to which such vessels respectively belong,
and the number of seamen employed.
By Command,
SECRETARY'S OFFICE,
Montreal, 22d March, 1815,
D. DALY, Secy.
Letter from the Deputy Inspector General to the Provincial Secretary:
INSPECTOR GENERAL'S OFFICE, Montreal, 20th March, 1845.
SIR,--I have the honor herewith to transmit a Return of the Tonnage and number of vessels owned in
this Province, distinguishing those employed on the Lakes, those in the River St. Lawrence between Montreal
and Kingston, and on the Rideau Canal, those in the River St. Lawrence above Quebec, those in the Coasting
Trade below Quebec and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and those in Trade beyond the Seas, as nearly as can be
ascertained, as required by an Address from the Honorable the Legislative Assembly,. :
10th February, 1844-,
herewith returned. I have the honor to be, Sir,
Your most obedient servant,
JOSEPH CARY,
D
Honorable D. DALY, Provincial Secretary.
Deputy Inspector General.
-

2 I

P" j

=e-•,.

RETURN Of the Tonnage and number of Ships and other Vessels owned in this Province in the year 1844, distinguishing as nearly as may be, those employed
on the Lakes, those in the River St. Lawrence above Quebec, those in the Coasting Trade below Quebec and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and those in
Trade beyond the Seas, as nearly as can be ascertained, &c., furnished pursuant to an Address from the Honorable the Legislative Assembly of 10th
February, 1845.
Employed on the Lakes.
Ports -or Places in this
Province to which the
Vessels belong.

Steamers.

Sailing Vessels.

On River St. Lawrence above
Quebec.

On the River St. Lawrence be- In the Coasting Trade below
Quebec and in the Gulf of St.
tween Montreal & Kingston
Lawrence.
and on the Rideau Canal.

Remarks,

Sailing Vessels,
Barges, &c.

Steamers.

In Trade beyond the Seas.

Barges.

Steamers.

Sailing Vessels.

Steamers.

Steamers.

Sailing Vessels.

No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men. No. Tons Men.
Quebec,
...
New-Carlisle,
...
Montreal,
Between Montreal &
Kingston on the River St. Lawrence &
on the Rideau Canal,
...

16 1545 101 112

7407 544

20 4634 313 21

3147 142

339 16031 1310
7
307 28
903 63
17

.1 •

53 27425 868
•••
..•
2 1213 38

36 3496 443 123 7242 637
(This item is founded on the Returns
of Vessels payingLight House Duty,
navigating the Lakes, there being
no registry.

about

Ports in Upper Canada, 14 3133
Total, ...

14 3133 ••••

120 8967
120 8967

•• •

•• •

•• •

•••

63 17241 1401

36 6179 414 133 10754 686 36 3496 443 123 7242 :637

55 28638 906

RECAPITULATION.
Sailing Vessels,
Bars, &c.

Steamers.
Where employed, &c,

On the Lakes,
...
...
On the River St. Lawrence above Quebec,
On the River St. Lawrence between Montreal and Kingston and on the Rideau Canal,
In the Coasting Trade below Quebec and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence,...
In Trade beyond the Seas, ...
Total,

•.!

No.

Tons.

14
36
36

3133
6179
3496

Men,

86

12808

'

No. Tons. Men.

414
443

about
120 8967
133 10754
123 7242
363 17241
55 28638

686
637
1401
906

857

794 72842

3630

.t.
...•

Remarks.

Vessels paying Tonnage Duty, navigating the Lakes.

INSPECTOR GENERAL'S OFFICE,

Montreal, 20th March, 1845.
JOS. CARY,

Deputy Inspector General.

8 Victorioe.

Appendix (I. 1. I.)

A 1844-5.

Appendix
L I.)

Appendix
I. I.)

24th March.

RETURN

24th March.

To an Address from the Legislative Assembly to His Excellency the Governor General, bearing date the 12th December, 1844, praying for a Statement of the number of Suits brought
in the Court of Chancery since 19th July, 1841, shewing the number of suits actually adjudicated upon, the amount of costs taxed, and allowed on each suit, and the amount of
fees paid on each suit to the Registrar, together with a detailed Statement exhibiting the
aggregate sums received by that Officer, by way of fees and charges on the said suits.
SECRETARY'S OFFICE,
Montreal, 24th March, 1845.

Letter from the Registrar of the Court of Chancery to the Provincial Secretary, with two Enclosures.
REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, COURT OF CHANCERY,

Toronto, 17th March, 1845.
SIR,--I beg to transmit you herewith, a Statement of
the number of Suits instituted in the Court of Chancery, between the 19th day of July, 1841, and the 12th
day of December, 1844, and of the number of Suits
adjudicated upon during the same period ; also a Return
of such costs as have been taxed during the same period, and the amount of Registrar's Fees during the
first and last years of that period. The Suits in which
costs have been taxed do not by any means embrace
the whole number of Suits in which proceedings have
been had during the period referred to, costs being frequently settled without taxation, and in the majority of
cases the costs of unsuccessful parties are not taxed.
Judging from the amount of Registrar's Fees during
the two years referred to, I should infer that costs are
taxed only in about one instance out of three or four
in which they are incurred. The aggregate of the Registrar's Fees therefore, as appearing from the taxation
of costs, will furnish no information as to the amount of
the Fees actually derived from his office. The aggregate
amount will appear by the Returns of the emoluments
of the office; and for the accuracy of the Returns since
I have held the office, I can vouch.

In omitting the Return of Registrar's Fees for the
period between the first and last years, I am aware
that I have not strictly followed the terms of your letter, but in explanation, I beg to say that I have been
prevented by illness from making the Return so soon as
I otherwise should have done,—that since my recovery
I have devoted to it and to my office, almost more time
and labor than my heath (imperfectly restored) could
warrant, and I was unwilling to make the further delay
which would necessarily occur in supplying the part
omitted,—every bill of costs requiring to be examined
throughout, in order to ascertain the amount of Registrar's fees contained therein. The Return enclosed exhibits the relative proportion between the Registrar's.
Fees and the general costs, during, the first and last
years ; the proportion during the former period being
about one third larger than during the latter, although
the greater portion of the proceedings in the more expensive suits, taxed during the latter period, occurred
during the former. In future the difference will be
still greater. In future also, there can be no doubt that
the costs in suits in Chancery will be materially diminished.,

By Command,

a

DALY, Secy.

I believe the Return of Registrar's Fees, during the
omitted period, would furnish no additional information,
but, if required, I will prepare such Return with as little
delay as possible.
I have the honor to be, Sir,
Your obedient servant,
J. G. SPRAGGE,
ca

Registrar.

The Honble. D. DALY,
Secretary of the Province,
&c. &c. &c.,

First Enclosure.
A STATEMENT of the number of Suits brought in
the Court of Chancery from the 19th day of July, 1841,
to the 12th day of December, 1844, shewing the number of Suits actually adjudicated upon—also a Schedule
of costs taxed during the same period, and the amount
of Fees paid to the Registrar during the first and also
during the last years of the same period, in the suits in
which costs have been so taxed, exhibiting the aggregate sums received by that officer by way of Fees and
charges in the said suits during the said first and last
years of the same period :
'

*umber of Suits brought in the Court of Chancery, from 19th July, 1841, to 12th De- 463
cember, 1844 ...................................................
ber of Suits adjudicated upon during the
same period, .................................................. 155
It should be explained that Suits are frequently disposed of in effect, otherwise than by a formal adjudication upon the hearing—the argument of pleas and
demurrers—the granting or refusing of special injunctions, both parties being heard—motions to dissolve special injunction, and some other applications to the
Court where the law and merits of the case are brought
in question, frequently though not necessarily have the
effect of a formal decision, the unsuccessful party not
choosing to risk further proceedings. These are, of
course, not embraced in the number above given of
Ras adjudicated upon.
It frequently occurs also that a Plaintiff finding after
answer, and perhaps after evidence gone into, that his
case cannot be sustained, forbears to proceed, and the
Suit is afterwards dismissed for want of prosecution.
In-these ways, many Suits are disposed of without a regular adjudication.
J. G. SPRAGGE,.

•

•

A. 1844-5.

Appendix (I. I. I.)

8 Vietorme.

Appendix

Appendix

(Second Enclosure.)

(I. I. I.)

(I. I. I.)

of Taxations in Chancery, from the 22nd day of July, 1841, to 31st day of December, 1844..

fareh. SCHEDULE
e4r-11-'1:--

•

s.

d.

"

8
0 0
9 17 3
1r 17
47 18 2
7
78
,

;

,

4.0--

.

33
30
32
11
48
56
18
20

11
32
7
19

1 a

4
.1

15

6

1 236

18

0

7. 11
18
3
8
14
6
4
1
2
4
14 17
6..
7
42 12
8
7
104
42 13
24 11 1 11
58 _ 0
8
21 /5
2
20 10 5
33
4
012
9 9
16
815 12
1
6 14 .7
30
4. '6,
26 16 in
3
41
5
19 15
5
22
5 11
2
28
-07 '8
737
2
12
7
4
23 8 2

78

a. d.
7
0
0 15 2
0 17 4
2
!P
4
S 16 6
11
14 10
I
12

•
-4c

s„.
15

et.

M`Lelland vs. Lyon, ...
6 I Scott vs. Ketchum, .....
12 12
1
9
8
Moffatt vs. O'Reilly,
1
4
12 12
vs. McDougall,
8
8
Covert vs. Bank of Upper
c 6 vs. Ranier,
4
Canada
2
13
' vs, Munshaw,
2
15 12
Robertson vs. Loring, ...
11
...
3
0
6
8 I Ross vs. Martin,
9
McKenzie vs. Kerby, ...
19 lb Lee vs. McNaughton,
28
0
0c1
Burnham vs. Leihshitz,
6 Fish vs. Burnside, ...
14
52
8
0 I 4
Covert vs. Bank of Upper
Hiscott vs. Berruyer,
Canada, ...
9 11 Adams vs. Morton, ...
6 4 10
Davis vs. Commercial Bank,
10
4
0
2' Kilborn vs. Flint, ...
7 8
Robertson vs. Bell, ...
14 11"
9
9
93 18
• .—
Edgar vs. Chambers,
39 -0
1
1
8 10
Cull vs. Boyer, ...
7 •18
3
0
4 ".*
Crooks vs. Dickson, ...
.
23 17
2'
4
3 10 Smith vs. Manahan,
Humphrey vs. Hodgson, ...I
4
1
19 13
2r
3 Smith vs. Simpson,...
Leslie vs. Hinds,
18 16 11
1
17
2 Counter vs. McPherson, ...
Dougall vs. Spragge,
Scott vs. Waddle,
... 6
11 17
2
0.
..,
Parrott vs. Davy,
...
17 12
8
r
18 Ag M`Donell vs. Jackson,
Demorest vs. Carpenter;;
McClure vs. Bassett, ...
3
9 166
1
Molson vs. Crooks, ...
22 19
5
2
6
6 Andruss vs. Sheldon,
Finlay vs. McDonald, ...
...
4 17 3
0 Sheldon vs. Andruss,
0
6
,
Same vs. Same,
3 6
0
0 Sheldon vs. Loder,
90
Same vs. Same,
.
10
16
0
4 Tribe vs. McKenzie,
7 10
.
McIntosh vs. Gifford,
4
38 4 7
5 Biscoe vs. Chamberlain,
3Same vs. Same, ...
13
1
8
7
11
6 Roberts vs. Saxon, ...
Finlay vs. McDonald, ...
3 5 1 0 0 I 0 0 Benson vs. Bagg,
Commercial Bank vs. McBaldwin vs. Walker,
Lean,
. •
„.
1
14
2
19- 16 M'Nab vs. Middleton,
Same vs. Same,. ...
...
12
1
1
1
2
2 In re Street,
Sinclair vs. Arnold, ••• •
3
10
5
0
15 10
Mosier vs. Hunter,. ...
0
44 11
4
9
8 McLeod v . McDonell,
Clapp vs. Clapp,. —.
6
17 17
1
10
4 Taylor vs. Elmsley,
Holmes vs. Perry,- —.
1
48 16
4 10
8, Rhodes vs. Lawder,
Bradbury vs. Hurd, ...
53
0 10' 4
9 Foot vs. Latnphier,
7
Black vs. Thompson, ...
.. 1
9
22
5
6
4
3 Court vs. McDonald,
Jarvis vs. Hamilton, ...
McGill vs. Knott,
...
42 15
6
3
3
1
Burnside vs. Fish,
28 14
3
2 7 Wardropp vs. Brown, ...
Steen vs. Hubbell, .,
Crooks vs. Bemis,
... ;
9 8
I
18
11
Yale vs. Alderman,
Same cause,
... ... ...
21 10 8
2
16
Crooks vs. Macitab, .;.
27
9 11
6 Coml. Bank vs. Fisher, ...
3
4
9' In re Handley, a Lunatic t-Coml. Bank vs. Parker, , ..„ .19 11 7
1
1,7
McDougall vs. Robertson,,
'General costs of " Trustees:
12.
5
7
Malony vs. Malony,
£51 4 4
23
9
3: 13
Same vs. Same, ...
27 3 1
4
6
5
O
2
Malony vs. Martin,
8 9
18
3
2
Same vs. Same, ...
Costs of J. C Tildesly,
5 4 °8
2
O
Riddell vs. Ridout,
7 ..•6, one of the Trustees:
19
6 ,7
2
Chew vs. Clifford,
£5 16 7
A
2
17
.1
Hector vs. Powell,
4 19 10
3
8 9
...
Playter vs. Wells,
12 2
17 7 10
7
1
Same vs. Same, ...
6 2
6 18
O ta
Brooke vs. Carey,
'34 10
2
16
Ridout vs. C. M. & N. J.Ives, 138 14
Costs of Robert IL nu, a
12
4
1
Wilson vs. Wilson, ...,
4 retiring Trustee :
4
52 1'3
4 , 6
Same vs. Same, ...
£7 1
2
•34 10 5
6 1
Mosier vs. Hunter, ...
3
a7
71
5
0
4 11
5
McIntosh vs. McIntosh,
7 13 9
25 2 g
2
2
Same cause,
...
10 5 0
8
16
O
Baby vs. Strachan,
:4.04 Jan 9 10 6
01.
;6
Costs of the wife of the
5
Tribe vs. McKenzie, ... ,,„
'Lunatic :
7,1 1 5
Anglin vs.'M'Intosh,
£16 15 9
,, 1
2
.9
McKenzie vs. Tribe, ... 61 13 6,
12 '12
10
6
Leeming vs. The Desjardins Canal Companf,
1 73 1196 41
3 fit
1
2
6
Same cause,
...
11
0
3
0
Flint vs. Danl. Jones,
. osts of G.S. Boulton one
e
2
61 16 11
6
Same cause, ...
0 -the Trustees :
15 19. 10
1
6
Flint vs. J. E. Jones,,, :
le 16 5
£40 17 6
. it'
.b,,
Same cause,
...
-15 19 10
30 1PO• 11
1
-6
Forsyth vs. Gamble, ...
Q,; 4
4 19 11
45 46
Hart vs. Wilson, ...
28 18 10.
3, 17
.8
Norman vs. Andruss,... .
7
1 Wardropp vs. Brown, ...
79 18 3,
3
Counter vs. McPherson, ... 110 14 TO
18 10 McLeod vs. McDonell,
4
Ross vs. Martin, ...
.
O
16 10 Wilson vs. Johnston, ...
3 13 5
Drew vs. Vansittart,
159
8
... ... ...
t ' s 13 •- 4 Same cause,
Blore vs. Thompson, ...
13. ., 5 McDonell vs. Jackson,
36 13
....
Empey vs. Loucks, ...
68
16
Charles vs. Westmacott, ...
Kirby vs. Young,
...
19
13' 'to Same cause,
2'
... ... .
Fish vs. Burnside,,
5 18 1
... ...
8. '2 Same cause,
O
, ,
Kennedy vs. M
28 15
6 ' 10 - Molson vs. Crooks, ...
Anderson vs, Ryan, ...
17 18
14,_ 11)- •r t 1. Strange vs. Wragg, ... '''.
Lee vs. M`Naughton,...
0
35
1
4- Same vs. Same, ... ...
0
3
Drew vs. Vansittart,
14 2
6
8 Lyons vs. Chisholm, ...
1
6

24th arch.

Appendix (I. I. I.)

8 Vietoriw.
Appendix
(I. T. 1.)

. SCHEDULE

A. 1844-5.
Appendix

of Taxations in Chancery, &c.—(Continued.)

(I. I. I.)

r-- -Th
24th March

General Costs. 'Registrar's Fees.

£

s.

d.

s.

General Costs. Registrar's Fees.

d.

X

s.

.•£

d.

8.

d.

Hooper vs.
•••
Lyons vs. Chisholm & Wife, 20 6
5
Carpenter vs. Demorest ... : .1V5
Hess vs. M`Kenzie, ... ...
38
3
9
1Baby vs. Baby, ... ... — ;..Sp ,11
Wardropp vs. Brown, ... ••• . 6 , , 4 10
I Mowat vs. Harne ... ••
... ...
Berford vs. Lewis,
17 10 10
20 17
I
Beasley vs. Cahill,'
Ritchie vs. Burns,
••• - a 7 * 7-9 . 4 10
••••ii,,v) -to • ,• 0
In re M`Donell,
Warren vs. Elinsfey, ... .
06 17
3
...' . •
24
6
2
. Smith vs. M‘Quarry, • .00 14
Taylor vs. Same,
... ... 0;4 13
5
17 )1
7Chambers vs. Hall, ... ...
M‘Kay vs. Borde,
. .. .8
25
9
19 14
1
Burnham vs. Bedford,... u.;
Sutherland vs. Sumner,
10 16 . .8
18 18
8
.
Mowat vs. Carscallan,
... 21 12
6
Hancox vs. M‘Lean, ... ..
Robertson vs. Bell, ... s••• = 19 14
1
27 11
.16
0
Ilineks vs. M'Elderry,
...
Same vs. Same. ... ...
18 , 9
1
9
11
.8
_ . 1.9 13 10
i1
1
M‘Glashen vs. Thompson,... 138 '. 2 1
7
Robertson vs. RR, ...%
' 18 11
.2
9
0
so 14
Cahill vs. Beasley, ... ..
4
4
o
1
7
0
0
-1
M‘Millan vs. Welland Canal
0
17
12
11
14
8
Att.
Gen.
vs.
Sutherland,
—
... ...
23 10. 10
Company,
..
0
1
16 10
0
14
)
5 baby vs. Lewis, ••• ••• -••
Ogilvie vs. Hogg,
•.• ••• 100 13
9
0
0
0
3
3
5
In re Street.
... ........,.
6
28 - 10) 4
0
15
I 1"
.
1 4 6
Baker vs. Scriven ,.. .... i...
Lockhart vs. Patrick,
1
...
15 12
1 1 1'12
9
3
5
6
Bowly vs. Langs,
....; ..
1,8
Lockhart vs. Turner, ..• ,.. (Alg 0) i /.•-.
1
1Smith vs. Chisholm, ..: ...
Gregg vs. Townsley, ... ...
12
5
6
15
1
0
t
69
63
1Beasley vs. Cahill,
..
M`Laren vs. Anderson,
2
...11,11f, 4.is
19•
6
2
0
5
2
1
Chambers vs. Hall, ... — . 21
Wilson vs. Hollingshead, ...
24 10
6
1 11
0
5 10
1
8 11
Comfort vs. Comfort,...
Charles vs. Hickson, ... .. •
20
118 10 10
1
1
0
2Burns vs. M'Kenzie, ...
Whitta vs. Bellnap, ...
7 16
24
6
5
0
6 10
Drew
vs.
Vansittart,
...
Hurd vs. Bonnycastle,
6 10
282
3
7 10
17
8
1-0
4
t2
Smith vs. Cullen,
In re Wilson—In fault,
.•.
4s 11- -12 4 ,, - '
11
1
0
4
,,
9
Handlin vs. Gram, .
8 10
68
,1 12
•
,,
'l
0
•••
5
2
16
6
7
4
:
6
I} i
4
-••
••
Humphrey vs. Street,...
9
16 13
49
3
Waite vs. Place, ... ...
•••
22
17
7
8
9
0
1 10
•••
20 16
3
5
1
7 lo
9
2)
,2
Com. Bank vs. Richardson, 39 16
7
•••
11
7
4
1
0
0
O'Neil vs. Wilson,
... ••••
Same vs. Same ... ... ... (20 .13 . $,
21
6
2
0
12
2,
Gerard vs. Muirhead,... ,
M`Millan vs. Welland Can'al
35
4
/
3
7 , 0
;)
,,
.• ::
....
...
.. ..
Company,
3 '10
13
9
5
1
4
, : ,,tit Hostler vs. Ball,
Sutherland vs. Sumner,
... •••
47
50 10
4
9•
1
3
0
0
.,
,2
Rhodes vs. Lawder, .•. .•
13 17 .11)1.
31.11
i7
6
7
0
9
8
Glass vs. Mattheson, ...
vs. Silterthorn,...
i
19 11
.1,
0
.4
8
8
1
tfi') Silverthorn
2)
••• •••
Smyth
vs. Manahan, ...
1 11
15
5
27 15
8
0
6
8
Proudfoot vs. M`Gill,...
8
34 10
•••
25
8
3
0
9
4
Waite vs. Place, ... ...
••• •.. •BO
2
4
12
1
0
2
6
3
11
/7
7
5
1
5
M‘Leod vs. Mitchell, .., •.
••• ••• ••
25
7
7
428
0
M'Glashen vs. Thompson,— 54
Whitta vs. M`Intosh, ... .,
9
5 ,
9
4 , 4
0.
_
,,, 11 11i N1 •
Cary vs. Crandle
Johnston vs. Cameron,
...
22 ,5
$,
li
5
1
Coml. Bank vs. Ross,
Silverthorn vs. Silverthorn:.?:.
6
61 '18'
1
3 111
17
),
3
19
2
... ...
Shaw vs. Huffman,
"41 16
0. 9
.14
Coml. Bank vs. M‘Laren, ...
Ca 12 . • * • •..=
Fisher vs. M'Creaye, ....
1181 19
2
'6'
13
••
;•
In re Street,
... ... ...
1..
8 18
...2` .,
1
14
8
•• - -....11 11,27
,.
Baby
vs.
Miller,
••• ••• •••
6 18
8=
22 16
9
4
17
Cathcart vs. Stinson,•
Demorest vs. Carpenter, ...
4 H
23
4 10
8
0
5
4
In re Wilson,
... ...
Hill vs. Hubbs,
••• •
1
25 11
41 18
9
2
1
6
... ...
Same matter,
Gore Bank vs. Digby,...
12
9'
2 •
19*
2
71
18
7
Same matter,
... ...
Ferguson vs. Post, ...
4
5
2
3
1
0
0
5 11
Humphrey vs. Street,
..•
Ferrie vs. Keith,
2•
8
9
49
22 11
0
1
9 11
17
3In re Street,
... ...
20 16
12 14
5
0
•••
O'Beirne vs. Gillet, ...
.
4
7
11
14
1
14254
ilearnes vs. Wismer, ... 1
oks, ... ••
6
5
3
■■ q
Gil
Gilmour
vs. Crooks,
29
1
10
4
0
_
Robertson vs. Bell, ... ...Stinson vs. Irvine,
...
12
5 10,
5.
12 14
rt.
1
2
6
Andruss vs. Sheldon, ... . ..
M`Leod
vs.
M'Leod,
...
—
'9 14
4
34
3
1
2
8
8
I
...
Adamson
vs.
Keefer,
...
9 13
7
•
,19 15
2
1
18 10
,
Clement vs. Downer, .•.
Bloor
vs.
Bank
U.
C....
12 14
4
14 10
5
0
15
,,
0
Same cause,
... ..• •••
'3 12 10
.
•••
14 15
2
2
0
6
Riley vs. Smyth,
•••
Gott vs. Roxburgh, ... •
36 14
3
30
0
8
2ts 4
5
Robertson vs. Bell, ... ...
Young vs. Montgomery, .
4
80
10
1
8
8
0
13
9
),
Shaw vs. Burrell,
... •
77
494
16 _ 8
3
0
6
7
2
f7
4 '.
11.," Humphrey vs. Street,... ...
•• .
3
I
. 7
17
9
7
0
1
10
- um Smith vs.
'27' 0 11 - 14
7
7
2
1
0
Drummond vs. M`Donell, ..
86 16
7
36
9 10
3
0
0
,•
• OS •••
33 18
7
8
14
0
0
7
8
Charles vs. Wright, ...
Cullen vs. Price,
s
18 10
... ...
5
12
1
0
7
17 10
.
..• .••
Same cause,
••• •••
9 12 7 4
14
8
0
0
16
7
Ford vs. Teeples,
... ...
21
In re Merritt, alleged Bank2
6
Forsyth vs. Wintermute, .••
17 14•
rapt,
... ••• ..• 0.
41
1
1
2
6
B. A. Assurance Co. vs.
Baldwin vs. Walker, ...
•.
19 15
0
0
17
4
Griffith, ... ... — ...
19
—.9 I 3 112
£ 1757
-

•••

)

•••

,,

,,

1,,

Alba

11

7/

•.•

•••

,)

•••

79

19

17

77

;)

•••

.0,,

17

17

7/

Vie

47

71

"
/7

7)

17

If

'

'

17

J. G. SPRAGGE, •

Registrar,

24th March.

8 Victoria;.

Appendix (J. J. J.)

A. 1844-5.
A ppendix

Appendix

4

(J. J. J.)

(Second Enclosure.)

(J. J. J.)
4th March.

STATEMENT of the Cost and Dimensions of the Welland Canal to the Twelfth Lock,
of the lateral cut to the Town of Niagara.

and 24th

.0■•■=wm■•01.

CONTRACTORS NAMES AND NUMBERS OF
AMOUNT PAID. TOTAL AMOUNT. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. QUANTITY.
LOCKS.
'

s. d.

s. d.

1 6894 0 0
Sherwood & Buell, ...
... 2 2265 0 0
Brown & McDonell,
... final, 3 to 6 37255 5 9
Geo. Barnett, ...
W. Courtwright & Co. ... do. 7 and 8 19134 5 0
... 9 to 12 34472 1 0
E W. Thompson & Co.
,.. 2750 0 0
Lock Gates, ...
3295 10 10
Moore & Cromwell, waste weirs, ...
R. M. Boyle, ...
do. do.
... .:. 1245 0 0
Waste weir, Port Dalhousie,—
G. Barnett, Earth Excavation in reaches, 3556 9 6
Courtwright & Co. do. do. ... 1459 4 6
Higham & Co. do. below St. Catherines, 2343 0 0
Cotton & Rowe, Dredg ng,
Russell Piers, Port Dalhousie,
...
Land Damages, Saw Mills, &c.
2531 0 0
Superintendence, ...
... 2000 0 0
Moore & Cromwell, floating tow path, ...

17475 0 0
12326 0 0
37255 5 9
19134 5 0
35950 1 0
7000 0 0
3750 0 0
2100 0 0
1200 0 0
4956 9 6
2173 4 6
5000 0 0
5541 12 9
12000 0 0
2531 0 0
3000 0 0
3393 0 0

PRICE.

I AMOUNT.
£

Earth Excavation, ...
Masonry for 13 Locks,
Foundations for do.
Lock Gates,

1s. 62000 0 0

49369

40s. 98792 0 0

13

13000 0 0
6500 0 0

...

Waste Weirs, ...
Culverts,
Land
acres,
C ontingencies, 10 r cent.

s. d.

1240000

13 £651

8463 0 0

18000 0 0
6
329 £12 10s. 4112 10 0
21086 0 0

I' 119200 16 7 174785 18 6
51167 11 6
Difference in favor of Welland Canal, ...
231953 10 0

Locks 2-200 X 45
Do. 10-150 X 261
12 feet, 1 mile.
Depth of Water, 10 do. 31 do.
9 do. 22 do.
i to A mile for 2 miles.
70 feet do. 3 do-.
Width of bottom,
45 do. do. 2 do. t
Width of tow path, 15 feet on top.
Do. berm bank, 12 do. do.
Side slopes, 2 to 1.
Total length 7 miles.
Rise 145 feet.
This Statement shews the extent of the Steamboat
navigation.

£1231953 10 0

Locks 13-150 X 26A
Depth of water, 9 feet.
Width of bottom, 45 feet.
Width of towing path, 15 feet on top.
Do. berm bank,
12 do.
do.
Side slopes, 2 to 1.
Total length, 111 miles.
Rise, 145 feet.
The prices assumed in this Estimate are the result
of the most careful consideration, and the very extensive observations which there has been an opportunity
of making on the actual cost of similar works.
In no instance has the value of the work on the
Welland been over-estimated.

( Third Enclosure.)
WELLAND CANAL OFFICE,

I

directed one of my assistants (Mr. Slater) to take

St. Catherines, 6th March, 1845. the levels of the line which was evidently most favorable for the construction of a Canal ; other and more
have the honor to acknowledge the receipt urgent duties prevented this gentleman from at once
of your letter of the 22nd, enclosing the Resolution of attending to this business, and he was unable to cornthe House of Assembly requiring certain information plete the Survey until the latter part of October, when
respecting the proposed lateral cut from the Welland he entered Niagara on one of the Polling days; it has,
Canal to the Town of Niagara. (I believe) been asserted with an intention to influence
the election against the gentleman who has now the
I have, therefore, to submit the following Statement, honor to represent that Town. It does not seem possible
which will, I trust, satisfactorily explain all the matters that the appearance of this officer could have exercised
adverted to in the Resolution. any influence on the election,—certainly it could not
have produced nor have been intended to produce such
On the 25th September, I was instructed by the an effect as that attributed to it, for it was well known
Chairman of the Board of Works to make the Survey that the Survey was made in compliance with the reand take the levels necessary for ascertaining the cost quest of many of the most respectable inhabitants, supof the proposed Canal, in compliance (as 1 understood) porters of the successful candidate, to defeat whom was
with a request formerly made by Mr. Cayley and other the alleged object of the Survey. I shall merely say
gentlemen resident in Niagara. that the selection of that day was purely accidental, the
officer alluded to did not even know that it was one
I accordingly examined the ground lying between of the Polling days, so little interest did he feel in the
that Town and a point situated at the head of the matter.
twelfth Lock from Port Dalhousie, where the Welland
The plan which I have already forwarded to the
Canal emerges from the valley of Dick's Creek ; the
cost of the additional Locks was a sufficient objection to Board, with the memoranda and estimates thereto atthe selection of any point higher up, and the height of tached, exhibits all the information acquired by the
the table land between St. Catherines and Niagara Survey ; it shews that the ground between the points
precluded the possibility of leaving the Canal lower abovementioned is exceedingly favorable for the locadown. tion of a Canal, the line of which (marked blue on the

march.

8 Vietoriw.

Appendix (J..1. J.)

Appendix
( J. J. J. ) plan) may be straight throughout, proceeding in a direct
line from its departure from the Welland to its junction
j
with the Niagara river. No obstacle whatever is pre24 th Much
.
sented, except by the valleys of the creeks which empty themselves into the lake between the mouth of the
Niagara and Port Dalhousie, of which the Four and
and Ten Mile Creeks can alone be considered formi
dable, and the expense of crossing even these is not
considerable, being much less than that of the additional lockage and excavation which would be caused by
the attempt to avoid those ravines by a line situated
near the main ridge. The line for nine miles passes
through that portion of the country denominated the
Swamp, generally in the vicinity of the main road, and
reaches the Niagara River immediately below Fort
George, this point being selected as the entrance, for
the reasons formerly assigned by Mr. Roy, " that the
" current is too rapid for a safe harbour above, and be" low it would be exposed to the swells of the lake."
The accompanying Schedule shews the cost of the
proposed Canal, and also that part of the Welland situated between No. 12 and Port Dalhousie, including
the construction of that Harbour. It proves that the
expense of the latter is at least £57,000 less than that
of the former could have been : thus regard for economy must have induced the Board of Works, as well as
the Welland Canal Company, to select Port Dalhousie
as the entrance, in preference to the mouth of the Nia 7
gara ; but there are many more important reasons
which must have exercised an influence on their deciL
sion. The length of the Canal from Port Dalhousie to
No. 12 is seven miles—that of the proposed cut from
the same point to Niagara is 114,—thus, the increased
length of the route, and consequently the increased cost
of transportation and loss of time, as well as the additional
expense of maintainance, are serious objections. Although the Harbour of the Niagara River may possess
some natural advantages, such as great depth of water,
sufficient extent and tolerable shelter, it is, nevertheless,
very inferior to the new Harbour about to be constructed at Port Dalhousie ; its defenceless position on the
frontier, is an insurmountable objection—the entrance
to the Canal would, in the event of a war, be exposed
to instant destruction from the guns of the American .
Fort ; but apart from this, it labours under other serious
defects, the removal of which is beyond the reach of
art. When there are light winds from the southerly
points, the rapid current renders the entrance very difficult ; and when the wind is from the northerly point
and, therefore, apparently favorable for the entrance of
vessels, the swell caused by the meeting of the waves
from the lake and the current of the river, is attended with great danger. To its exposed situation in the
event of war, and the difficulty of entrance during
the prevailing summer winds (from the south) must be
added the great danger arising from the floating ice
late in the spring,—and the existence of a shifting bar
at the mouth, which circumscribes the channel so far
as to render the egress of vessels both difficult and
dangerous when the wind is northerly.
The Harbour at Port Dalhousie will possess almost
unrivalled advantages. Accessible at all times, it will
have a depth of twelve feet water at its entrance ; an
outer and well sheltered Harbour more than half a mile
in length, amply sufficient for the accommodation of the
trade, to which must be added the extraordinary advantage of its inner Harbour, two miles long and nearly
half a mile wide, sufficiently large to contain all the
vessels on both lakes ; completely sheltered by the
surrounding hills, and raised by the first Lock above the
influence of the lake, so that the water can scarcely be
agitated during the most violent storms. The peculiar
facilities for the construction of a graving dock, cornbitted with the extent and security of this inner Harbour,
will, doubtless, at no distant period, render Port Dal-

A. 1844-5.

Appendix
housie the winter resort of a large amount of shipping (J. J. J.)
on the lakes. The location of the old piers, as well as
their plan and construction, was so faulty, that a strong 24th March.
prejudice has existed in the minds of many against this
Harbour. An examination of the plan of the new piers
will shew that, after the completion of the works now
in progress, this harbour will be free from all the defects which have been urged against it with much force
and some justice. 1 am happy to be supported in the &opinions now advanced by all the experienced masters g
0
of vessels whom I have had an opportunity of consulting.
•

co
z
a.

Co)

Appended to this Report is an account of a few of ,moo
the recent disasters arising from the above mentioned
defects in the Niagara Harbour. If so many accidents
have occurred among the few vessels that visit this
Harbour, and so few among the many that leave and/ 1
enter Port Dalhousie, defective as it at present is,
must be evident that the advantages of the latter and'
the disadvantages of the former have not been exaggerated in this Report.

Apprehensions are entertained by some, that at no
very distant period, the lower lake may become so
shallow•as to render all the works at Port Dalhousie
useless. A daily record of the levels kept by the Lock
Tender, since I have had charge of all the old works,
and the observations of the same person during fifteen
years, corroborated by those made at Fort Niagara since
1815, tend to show that the water of the lake is at
least as high now as it was many years ago, and I have
been unable to discover evidence to prove that any
change is going on rapidly, or reasons to justify us in
providing for so remote a contingency, long before the
probable occurrence of which all our works will be in
ruins.
Enough has been said to prove that, even if the selection of an entrance to the Welland were still an open
question, Port Dalhousie should be preferred on account
of the advantages of its Harbour, the shortness of the
line, and economy of construction. It therefore seems
needless at this time to make any remarks on the inexpediency of expending £230,000 on the construction of a lateral cut to Niagara, when a Canal, in
every respect more efficient than that could possibly be,
has been already constructed.
I have now furnished information on all the points
adverted to in the Resolution of the House, though not
exactly in the order there prescribed. Having first
mentioned the authority under which the Survey was
made,-2nd, the cause (as I believe) of its being
made,-3rd, the information derived from the Survey,
and the conclusion following a full examination of the
relative advantages and disadvantages of the entrances
at Port Dalhousie and Niagara, and the respective
routes from these harbours to the nearest point of the
Welland, and in connection with this, have shewn that
there is no evidence to prove that any change in the
level of the lake is going on rapidly.
I have the honor to be, Sir,
Your obedient servant,
S. POWER.
(Signed,)

•

THOMAS A. BEGLY, Esquire,
Secretary, Board of Works.
Vessels lost or driven on shore in attempting to make
Niagara Harbour :—" Thistle," " Essex," " General
Wolfe," and " Brothers."
The "Bond Head" is the only vessel which has
been wrecked at Port Dalhousie, and she was waterlogged before she neared the shore.